Gait-based gender classification using persistent homology
In this paper, a topological approach for gait-based gender recognition is presented. First, a stack of human silhouettes, extracted by background subtraction and thresholding, were glued through their gravity centers, forming a 3D digital image I. Second, different filters (i.e. particular orders o...
| Autores: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | capítulo de livro |
| Data de publicação: | 2013 |
| País: | España |
| Recursos: | Universidad de Sevilla (US) |
| Repositório: | idUS. Depósito de Investigación de la Universidad de Sevilla |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:idus.us.es:11441/30917 |
| Acesso em linha: | http://hdl.handle.net/11441/30917 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41827-3_46 |
| Access Level: | Acceso aberto |
| Palavra-chave: | gait-based recognition topology persistent homology gender classification |
| Resumo: | In this paper, a topological approach for gait-based gender recognition is presented. First, a stack of human silhouettes, extracted by background subtraction and thresholding, were glued through their gravity centers, forming a 3D digital image I. Second, different filters (i.e. particular orders of the simplices) are applied on ∂ K(I) (a simplicial complex obtained from I) which capture relations among the parts of the human body when walking. Finally, a topological signature is extracted from the persistence diagram according to each filter. The measure cosine is used to give a similarity value between topological signatures. The novelty of the paper is a notion of robustness of the provided method (which is also valid for gait recognition). Three experiments are performed using all human-camera view angles provided in CASIA-B database. The first one evaluates the named topological signature obtaining 98.3% (lateral view) of correct classification rates, for gender identification. The second one shows results for different human-camera distances according to training and test (i.e. training with a human-camera distance and test with a different one). The third one shows that upper body is more discriminative than lower body. |
|---|