Plasma electrolytic oxidation of aluminium using conventional anodizing precursors and electrolytic colouring with Cu, Sn and Ni

Previous studies have demonstrated that conventional anodizing precursors can reduce the energy consumption of plasma electrolytic oxidation (PEO) by facilitating the transition to the soft sparking regime, which produces denser coatings with improved wear performance. Here, we investigate the influ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Arrabal Durán, Raúl, Matykina, Endzhe, Hidalgo González, Itziar
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2025
País:España
Institución:Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM)
Repositorio:Docta Complutense
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/132382
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/132382
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:620
Plasma electrolytic oxidation
Anodizing
Electrolytic colouring
Copper
Tin
Nickel
Soft sparking
Wear
Corrosion
Aluminium
Materiales
3312 Tecnología de Materiales
Descripción
Sumario:Previous studies have demonstrated that conventional anodizing precursors can reduce the energy consumption of plasma electrolytic oxidation (PEO) by facilitating the transition to the soft sparking regime, which produces denser coatings with improved wear performance. Here, we investigate the influence of anodizing precursors electrolytically coloured with Cu, Sn and Ni prior to PEO. Metal species accelerate the transition to soft sparking, with Cu exhibiting the greatest energy savings (~ 54 %) due to deposits in the inner precursor regions promotin dielectric breakdown. Wear resistance of the most energy-efficient system (A(Cu)-PEO) was comparable to Cufree coatings (PEO, A-PEO), although A-PEO exhibited a lower friction coefficient (~ 0.69) after long sliding distances, linked to a more compact coating from extended soft sparking. Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) revealed that Cu led to a weaker barrier layer in A(Cu) PEO, yet the substrate showed negligible corrosion after 28 days in 3.5 wt% NaCl. Overall, A-PEO and A(Cu)-PEO are viable alternatives to conventional PEO, offering substantial energy savings without compromising performance.