Potential use of precipitates from Acid Mine Drainage (AMD) as arsenic adsorbents
The role of precipitates from acid mine drainage (AMD) in arsenic removal in water is a process to be investigated in more detail. The present study is focused on the potential use of two AMD precipitates using oxidation and Ca(OH)2 (OxPFe1) or CaCO3 (OxPFe2) as As(V) adsorbents and the comparison o...
| Autores: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2023 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC) |
| Repositorio: | UPCommons. Portal del coneixement obert de la UPC |
| Idioma: | inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:upcommons.upc.edu:2117/406237 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/2117/406237 https://dx.doi.org/10.3390/w15183179 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Acid mine drainage Iron ions -- Oxidation Adsorption Arsenic Iron oxide Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Enginyeria química |
| Sumario: | The role of precipitates from acid mine drainage (AMD) in arsenic removal in water is a process to be investigated in more detail. The present study is focused on the potential use of two AMD precipitates using oxidation and Ca(OH)2 (OxPFe1) or CaCO3 (OxPFe2) as As(V) adsorbents and the comparison of their performance with two commercial adsorbents (nanohematite and Bayoxide®). The AMD’s supernatants and precipitates were characterized using several techniques and assessed with theoretical speciation and mass balance methods. Gypsum was identified by XRD and assessed as the main component of the precipitates. Amorphous iron hydroxide was assessed as the second component (22% in mass), and jurbanite or aluminum hydroxide were present in the third likely phase. The equilibrium adsorption of As(V) in water at a pH between 4 and 6 was tested with the four adsorbents, and the Langmuir model correlated well. The maximum adsorption capacity (qmax) had the highest value for OxPFe1 and the lowest value for nanohematite (that could be explained in terms of the adsorbent surface speciation). The two precipitates have limited application to the adsorption of very low concentrations of arsenic because they have a binding constant (b) lower than the commercial adsorbents and could release a small amount of the arsenic contained in the precipitate. |
|---|