Evaluation of the ultrastructural and in vitro flow properties of the PreserFlo® microShunt

Purpose: To measure the in vitro flow properties of the PRESERFLO implant for comparison with the theoretical resistance to flow. Methods: The PRESERFLO was designed to control the flow of aqueous humor according to the Hagen-Poiseuille (HP) equation. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Ibarz Barberá, Marta, Hernández Verdejo, José Luis, Bragard, Jean, Burguete, Javier, Morales Fernández, Laura, Tañá Rivero, Pedro, Gómez De Liaño Sánchez, María Rosario, Teus Guezala, Miguel Ángel
Formato: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2021
País:España
Recursos:Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM)
Repositorio:Docta Complutense
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/4558
Acesso em linha:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/4558
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palavra-chave:617.7-007.681-089
617.749
612.842.6
PRESERFLO
Aqueous flow
Pressure drop
Glaucoma surgery
Hagen-Poiseuille
Cirugía
Oftalmología
3213 Cirugía
3201.09 Oftalmología
Descrição
Resumo:Purpose: To measure the in vitro flow properties of the PRESERFLO implant for comparison with the theoretical resistance to flow. Methods: The PRESERFLO was designed to control the flow of aqueous humor according to the Hagen-Poiseuille (HP) equation. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was performed to analyze the ultrastructure, and flowmeasurementswere carried out using a gravity-flow setup. Results: SEM images of the PRESERFLO showed luminal diameters of 67.73 × 65.95 μm and 63.66 × 70.54 μm. The total diameter was 337.2 μm, and the wall was 154 μm wide. The theoretical calculation of the resistance to flow(R) for an aqueous humor (AH) viscosity of 0.7185 centipoises (cP) was 1.3 mm Hg/(μL/min). Hence, assuming a constant AH flow of 2 μL/min, the pressure differential across the device (�P) was estimated to be 2.6 mm Hg. The gravity-flow experiment allowed us to measure the experimental resistance to flow, which was RE =1.301mmHg/(μL/min), in agreement with the theoretical resistance to flow R given by the HP equation. Conclusions: The experimental and theoretical flow testing showed that the pressure drop across this device would not be large enough to avoid hypotony unless the resistance to outflowof the sub-Tenon space was sufficient to control the intraocular pressure in the early postoperative period. Translational Relevance: The fluid properties of glaucoma subconjunctival drainage devices determine their specific bleb-forming capacity and ability to avoid hypotony and therefore their safety and efficacy profile.