Sustainability Factor for the Cost–Benefit Analysis of Building-Integrated Greenery Systems

Building-integrated greenery (BIG) systems, which include green roofs and green facades, are well-established nature-based solutions (NBS) with proven scientific benefits. However, initial costs and economic apprehensions stemming from potential negative outcomes act as adoption barriers. Furthermor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Reyes, Marcelo, Pérez, Gabriel, Coma Arpón, Julià
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2024
País:España
Institución:Consejo General de la Arquitectura Técnica de España (CGATE)
Repositorio:RIARTE
OAI Identifier:oai:www.riarte.es:20.500.12251/3818
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12251/3818
https://doi.org/10.3390/su16010157
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Vegetación
Cubiertas verdes
Fachada verde
Clasificación Int. Común Servi. Ecosist.(CICES)
Lleida
Emisiones de CO2
Huertos urbanos
Análisis coste-beneficio
3305.14 Viviendas
3103.01 Producción de Cultivos
3308.01 Control de la Contaminación Atmosférica
3308.04 Ingeniería de la Contaminación
Descripción
Sumario:Building-integrated greenery (BIG) systems, which include green roofs and green facades, are well-established nature-based solutions (NBS) with proven scientific benefits. However, initial costs and economic apprehensions stemming from potential negative outcomes act as adoption barriers. Furthermore, the lack of standardized indicators and assessment methodologies for evaluating the city-level impacts of BIG systems presents challenges for investors and policy makers. This paper addresses these issues by presenting a comprehensive set of indicators derived from widely accepted frameworks, such as the Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES) and the NBS impact evaluation handbook. These indicators contribute to the creation of a ‘sustainability factor’, which facilitates cost–benefit analyses for BIG projects using locally sourced data. The practical application of this factor to a 3500 m2 green roof in Lleida, Catalonia (Spain) demonstrates that allocating space for urban horticultural production (i.e., food production), CO2 capture, and creating new recreational areas produces benefits that outweigh the costs by a factor value of nine during the operational phase of the green roof. This cost–benefit analysis provides critical insights for investment decisions and public policies, especially considering the significant benefits at the city level associated with the implementation of BIG systems.