Optimizing the baiting strategy for oral vaccine delivery to wild boar

[EN] Baits are a means of orally delivering toxicants, medicaments, or chemical markers to wild boar and feral pigs (Sus scrofa). We tested three bait types, the paraffin-feed-sugar-based IREC bait (green and colorant-free versions), a puffed leguminous bait with the same flavoring as the IREC bait...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Pachauri, Richa, Martínez-Guijosa, Jordi, Ferreras-Colino, Elisa, Ferreres, Javier, Relimpio, David
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2024
País:España
Institución:Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
Repositorio:DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
OAI Identifier:oai:digital.csic.es:10261/360360
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/10261/360360
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:African swine fever
Sus scrofa
Bait deployment devices
Oral bait deployment
Feeding sites
id ES_8202175938530c839d132000df2cc0bb
oai_identifier_str oai:digital.csic.es:10261/360360
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Optimizing the baiting strategy for oral vaccine delivery to wild boar
title Optimizing the baiting strategy for oral vaccine delivery to wild boar
spellingShingle Optimizing the baiting strategy for oral vaccine delivery to wild boar
Pachauri, Richa
African swine fever
Sus scrofa
Bait deployment devices
Oral bait deployment
Feeding sites
title_short Optimizing the baiting strategy for oral vaccine delivery to wild boar
title_full Optimizing the baiting strategy for oral vaccine delivery to wild boar
title_fullStr Optimizing the baiting strategy for oral vaccine delivery to wild boar
title_full_unstemmed Optimizing the baiting strategy for oral vaccine delivery to wild boar
title_sort Optimizing the baiting strategy for oral vaccine delivery to wild boar
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Pachauri, Richa
Martínez-Guijosa, Jordi
Ferreras-Colino, Elisa
Ferreres, Javier
Relimpio, David
author Pachauri, Richa
author_facet Pachauri, Richa
Martínez-Guijosa, Jordi
Ferreras-Colino, Elisa
Ferreres, Javier
Relimpio, David
author_role author
author2 Martínez-Guijosa, Jordi
Ferreras-Colino, Elisa
Ferreres, Javier
Relimpio, David
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Conferencia de Rectores de las Universidades Españolas
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (España)
European Commission
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas [https://ror.org/02gfc7t72]
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv African swine fever
Sus scrofa
Bait deployment devices
Oral bait deployment
Feeding sites
topic African swine fever
Sus scrofa
Bait deployment devices
Oral bait deployment
Feeding sites
description [EN] Baits are a means of orally delivering toxicants, medicaments, or chemical markers to wild boar and feral pigs (Sus scrofa). We tested three bait types, the paraffin-feed-sugar-based IREC bait (green and colorant-free versions), a puffed leguminous bait with the same flavoring as the IREC bait (Flavor), and a plain puffed leguminous bait without flavoring (Plain). Baits were deployed in a fenced hunting estate with year-round feeding to assess bait type preference and study the effect of bait flavoring and coloring, pre-feeding, baiting device, and habituation on bait consumption and bait selectivity. Baits were deployed under heavy pavel stones, targeting adult wild boar, or in piglet-selective feeders. The main bait consumer was the wild boar (IREC 54%; Flavor 15%; Plain 16%) followed by azure-winged magpies (Cyanopica cooki; IREC 11%; Flavor 8%; Plain 17%). The most consumed bait was IREC (n = 164; 71%, mean 4.1 baits per site/day), followed by Flavor (102; 40%; 2.5) and Plain (70; 29%; 1.7). Pre-feeding increased bait consumption of all bait types (IREC 92%; Flavor 63%; Plain 40%). IREC baits were more consumed when deployed under stones (86%) than when deployed in piglet feeders (57%), while no difference between baiting devices was observed for Flavor and Plain baits. Birds preferred color-free baits (consumption ratio of 10% for color-free baits and 0% for green baits), while no other animal showed color preference. We suggest using green IREC-type baits, deployed after pre-baiting using species- and age-specific baiting devices.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024
2024
2024
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
Publisher's version
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10261/360360
url http://hdl.handle.net/10261/360360
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv #PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/HE/101136676
Pachauri, Richa; Martínez-Guijosa, Jordi; Ferreras-Colino, Elisa; Ferreres, Javier; Relimpio, David; 2024; Optimizing the baiting strategy for oral vaccine delivery to wild boar; Springer Nature; https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-024-01771-w
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-024-01771-w
Sí
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer Nature
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer Nature
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
instname:Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
instname_str Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
reponame_str DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
collection DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869412015493087232
spelling Optimizing the baiting strategy for oral vaccine delivery to wild boarPachauri, RichaMartínez-Guijosa, JordiFerreras-Colino, ElisaFerreres, JavierRelimpio, DavidAfrican swine feverSus scrofaBait deployment devicesOral bait deploymentFeeding sites[EN] Baits are a means of orally delivering toxicants, medicaments, or chemical markers to wild boar and feral pigs (Sus scrofa). We tested three bait types, the paraffin-feed-sugar-based IREC bait (green and colorant-free versions), a puffed leguminous bait with the same flavoring as the IREC bait (Flavor), and a plain puffed leguminous bait without flavoring (Plain). Baits were deployed in a fenced hunting estate with year-round feeding to assess bait type preference and study the effect of bait flavoring and coloring, pre-feeding, baiting device, and habituation on bait consumption and bait selectivity. Baits were deployed under heavy pavel stones, targeting adult wild boar, or in piglet-selective feeders. The main bait consumer was the wild boar (IREC 54%; Flavor 15%; Plain 16%) followed by azure-winged magpies (Cyanopica cooki; IREC 11%; Flavor 8%; Plain 17%). The most consumed bait was IREC (n = 164; 71%, mean 4.1 baits per site/day), followed by Flavor (102; 40%; 2.5) and Plain (70; 29%; 1.7). Pre-feeding increased bait consumption of all bait types (IREC 92%; Flavor 63%; Plain 40%). IREC baits were more consumed when deployed under stones (86%) than when deployed in piglet feeders (57%), while no difference between baiting devices was observed for Flavor and Plain baits. Birds preferred color-free baits (consumption ratio of 10% for color-free baits and 0% for green baits), while no other animal showed color preference. We suggest using green IREC-type baits, deployed after pre-baiting using species- and age-specific baiting devices.[ES] Los cebos son un medio para administrar por vía oral tóxicos, medicamentos o marcadores a jabalíes y cerdos salvajes (Sus scrofa). Probamos tres tipos de cebo, el cebo IREC a base de parafina y azúcar (versiones verdes y sin colorantes), un cebo de leguminosas infladas con el mismo sabor que el cebo IREC (Flavor) y el mismo cebo de leguminosas sin sabor (Plain). Los cebos se colocaron en una finca de caza cercada con alimentación durante todo el año para evaluar la preferencia del tipo de cebo y estudiar el efecto del sabor y color del cebo, el precebado, el dispositivo de cebo y la habituación sobre el consumo y la selectividad. Los cebos se colocaron debajo de piedras, dirigidos a jabalíes adultos, o en comederos selectivos para rayones. El principal consumidor fue el jabalí (IREC 54%; Sabor 15%; Sencillo 16%) seguido del rabilargo (Cyanopica cooki; IREC 11%; Flavor 8%; Plain 17%). El cebo más consumido fue IREC (n = 164; 71%, media 4,1 cebos por sitio/día), seguido de Flavor (102; 40%; 2,5) y Plain (70; 29%; 1,7). El precebado aumentó el consumo de todos los tipos de cebo (IREC 92%; Flavor 63%; Plain 40%). Los cebos IREC se consumieron más cuando se colocaron bajo piedras (86%) que cuando se dispusieron en comederos para rayones (57%), mientras que no se observaron diferencias entre dispositivos para los demás cebos. Las aves prefirieron los cebos sin color (proporción de consumo del 10% para cebos sin color y 0% para cebos verdes), mientras que ningún otro animal mostró preferencia en función del color. Sugerimos utilizar cebos verdes tipo IREC, distribuidos tras un precebado y utilizando dispositivos específicos para cada especie y edad.Open Access funding provided thanks to the CRUE-CSIC agreement with Springer Nature.This study is a contribution to the EU Horizon Europe grant ASFaVIP with reference number 101136676.Peer reviewedSpringer NatureConferencia de Rectores de las Universidades EspañolasConsejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (España)European CommissionConsejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas [https://ror.org/02gfc7t72]202420242024info:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Publisher's versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/360360reponame:DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSICinstname:Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)Inglés#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/HE/101136676Pachauri, Richa; Martínez-Guijosa, Jordi; Ferreras-Colino, Elisa; Ferreres, Javier; Relimpio, David; 2024; Optimizing the baiting strategy for oral vaccine delivery to wild boar; Springer Nature; https://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-024-01771-whttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10344-024-01771-wSíinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:digital.csic.es:10261/3603602026-05-22T06:33:51Z
score 15.811543

Similares en LA Referencia