High-resolution aboveground biomass mapping: the benefits of biome-specific deep learning models
Regional mapping of Above Ground Biomass Density (AGBD) using Remote Sensing data has shown high accuracy but lacks replicability at a global scale. In contrast, global models capture AGBD variability across biomes but struggle with biome-specific accuracy. To address this gap, we develop and assess...
| Autores: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2025 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universitat de Lleida (UdL) |
| Repositorio: | Repositori Obert UdL |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:repositori.udl.cat:10459.1/467857 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17071268 https://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/467857 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Above Ground Biomass (AGB) Biomes Deep learning Forest inventories |
| Sumario: | Regional mapping of Above Ground Biomass Density (AGBD) using Remote Sensing data has shown high accuracy but lacks replicability at a global scale. In contrast, global models capture AGBD variability across biomes but struggle with biome-specific accuracy. To address this gap, we develop and assess the performance of a Deep Learning model for mapping AGBD at 10-m resolution using multi-source satellite data (Sentinel-1, Sentinel-2, ALOS PALSAR-2, and GEDI) across four biomes: Mediterranean, taiga (boreal forests), tropical rainforests, and semi-arid savannas. The model is trained and validated separately for each biome, yielding four regional models with normalized RMSEs of 0.43–0.67 and correlation coefficients (r) of 0.61–0.77 against forest inventories. We compare predictions from these models to a benchmark dataset and to a model trained on all four biomes combined. The regional models consistently outperform both, achieving better metrics than the benchmark. Additionally, an analysis of prediction drivers reveals biome-specific differences, reinforcing the importance of per-biome mapping approaches. This study highlights the advantages and limitations of regional against global modeling, creating the basis for biome-specific, replicable, scalable and multi-temporal AGBD mapping. |
|---|