On the monotone upper bound problem

The Monotone Upper Bound Problem asks for the maximal number M(d,n) of vertices on a strictly-increasing edge-path on a simple d-polytope with n facets. More specifically, it asks whether the upper bound M(d,n) ≤ Mubt(d,n) provided by McMullen’s (1970) Upper Bound Theorem is tight, where Mubt(d,n) i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Pfeifle, Julián|||0000-0001-9777-2602, Ziegler, Günter M.
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2004
País:España
Institución:Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC)
Repositorio:UPCommons. Portal del coneixement obert de la UPC
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:upcommons.upc.edu:2117/7737
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/2117/7737
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Polytopes
Combinatory logic
Graph theory
Politops
Combinatoria
Grafs, Teoria de
Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Matemàtiques i estadística::Matemàtica discreta::Combinatòria
Descripción
Sumario:The Monotone Upper Bound Problem asks for the maximal number M(d,n) of vertices on a strictly-increasing edge-path on a simple d-polytope with n facets. More specifically, it asks whether the upper bound M(d,n) ≤ Mubt(d,n) provided by McMullen’s (1970) Upper Bound Theorem is tight, where Mubt(d,n) is the number of vertices of a dual-to-cyclic d-polytope with n facets. It was recently shown that the upper bound M(d,n) ≤ Mubt(d,n) holds with equality for small dimensions (d ≤ 4: Pfeifle, 2003) and for small corank (n ≤ d + 2: Gärtner et al., 2001). Here we prove that it is not tight in general: In dimension d=6 a polytope with n=9 facets can have Mubt(6,9)=30 vertices, but not more than 27 ≤ M(6,9) ≤ 29 vertices can lie on a strictly-increasing edge-path. The proof involves classification results about neighborly polytopes, Kalai’s (1988) concept of abstract objective functions, the Holt-Klee conditions (1998), explicit enumeration, Welzl’s (2001) extended Gale diagrams, randomized generation of instances, as well as non-realizability proofs via a version of the Farkas lemma.