A Disjoint Frame Topology-Independent TDMA MAC Policy for Safety Applications in Vehicular Networks
Medium access control (MAC) is a challenging problem in vehicular environments due to a constantly changing topology due to vehicle’s mobility and stringent delay requirements, especially for safety-related applications (e.g., for vehicular-to-vehicular communication). Consequently, topology-indepen...
| Autores: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2018 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | IMDEA Networks Institute |
| Repositorio: | IMDEA Networks Institute Digital Repository |
| Idioma: | inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:dspace.networks.imdea.org:20.500.12761/602 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12761/602 https://dx.doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adhoc.2018.06.006 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Vehicular networks TDMA MAC Topology-independent Safety Applications |
| Sumario: | Medium access control (MAC) is a challenging problem in vehicular environments due to a constantly changing topology due to vehicle’s mobility and stringent delay requirements, especially for safety-related applications (e.g., for vehicular-to-vehicular communication). Consequently, topology-independent TDMA MAC policies that guarantee a number of successful transmissions per frame independently of the underlying topology, can be regarded as a suitable choice for the particular vehicular environment. One such policy (TiMAC) is revisited and considered in this paper for a vehicular environment and is also extended to one that considers disjoint frames depending on the vehicle’s direction of movement (d-TiMAC). Both TiMAC and d-TiMAC are evaluated against VeMAC – a well-established TDMA MAC protocol in the area of vehicular networks – based on simulations. It is observed that throughput under the considered TiMAC policy is close to that induced by VeMAC, whereas the number of retransmissions is reduced leading to a smaller time delay. Furthermore, the proposed d-TiMAC appears to achieve a higher throughput than VeMAC, and an even lower number of retransmissions (when compared to TiMAC), suggesting that d-TiMAC yields an even smaller time delay. Eventually, this observation is also supported when d-TiMAC is compared against TiMAC showing a further reduced number of retransmissions. |
|---|