Sobre los conceptos de justificación del enunciado probatorio de las decisions judiciales y su doble conforme

This article analyses the concepts of justification of the proof statement included in the factual premise of the judicial decision and its double agreement, processed in two different legal instances. Both concepts are addressed from a normative viewpoint and its identification is a previous step f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Trotti, Maria Valeria
Tipo de recurso: tesis de maestría
Fecha de publicación:2019
País:España
Institución:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)
Repositorio:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
OAI Identifier:oai:recercat.cat:10256/19043
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/10256/19043
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Prova (Dret)
Evidence (Law)
Procediment judicial -- Argentina -- Córdova
Jurisprudence -- Argentina -- Córdoba
Jurisprudència -- Argentina -- Córdova
Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos
Judicial process -- Argentina -- Córdoba
Descripción
Sumario:This article analyses the concepts of justification of the proof statement included in the factual premise of the judicial decision and its double agreement, processed in two different legal instances. Both concepts are addressed from a normative viewpoint and its identification is a previous step for the analysis of two different matters dealt with in the regional and local jurisprudence. Firstly, it allows to critically review the jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights related to the motivation of proof statement included in the decision taken by a jury in a criminal case. Secondly, these concepts are relevant to analyses the appeal judicial instance’s higher or lower capacity of reasoning regarding the justification of this type of statements. This last aspect is addressed based on certain jurisprudence produced by the Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Cordoba, Argentina