Performance Analysis of Software-Defined Networking in Band Controllers for Different Network Topologies

With the great increase in the complexity of networking, software-defined networks have been developed to help administrators operate and configure network services with controllers such as Pox, Ryu, Floodlight and OpenDaylight. Those controllers offer an appropriate platform for applications that n...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Al-gubouri, Hussein Ali
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2024
País:España
Institución:Universidad de Salamanca (USAL)
Repositorio:GREDOS. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Salamanca
OAI Identifier:oai:gredos.usal.es:10366/162545
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/10366/162545
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:SDN
in band controllers
SDN topologies
SDN controllers
id ES_7f928b011d9e2865a5ed35eea5b60c19
oai_identifier_str oai:gredos.usal.es:10366/162545
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Performance Analysis of Software-Defined Networking in Band Controllers for Different Network TopologiesAl-gubouri, Hussein AliSDNin band controllersSDN topologiesSDN controllersWith the great increase in the complexity of networking, software-defined networks have been developed to help administrators operate and configure network services with controllers such as Pox, Ryu, Floodlight and OpenDaylight. Those controllers offer an appropriate platform for applications that need high bandwidth. In this paper, several SDN controllers have been evaluated using in-band communication mode with different network topologies to check the performance of the in-band controllers. Some controllers cannot operate with an in-band controller such as Pox. The controllers were evaluated with Mininet by using iperf and ping networking tools, the packet latency round trip time RTT and the comparison of the throughput of the three topologies. The results of the experiments showed that in-band controllers can be implemented and have efficient results. Results showed that OpenDaylight has the lower value of RTT so it is the best for the applications that need fast response. Ryu has a greater bandwidth value, so it is the best for applications that need high bandwidth. Floodlight comes third in order, after OpenDaylight and Ryu, respectively.Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca (España)202520252024info:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10366/162545reponame:GREDOS. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Salamancainstname:Universidad de Salamanca (USAL)info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:gredos.usal.es:10366/1625452026-06-07T06:28:51Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Performance Analysis of Software-Defined Networking in Band Controllers for Different Network Topologies
title Performance Analysis of Software-Defined Networking in Band Controllers for Different Network Topologies
spellingShingle Performance Analysis of Software-Defined Networking in Band Controllers for Different Network Topologies
Al-gubouri, Hussein Ali
SDN
in band controllers
SDN topologies
SDN controllers
title_short Performance Analysis of Software-Defined Networking in Band Controllers for Different Network Topologies
title_full Performance Analysis of Software-Defined Networking in Band Controllers for Different Network Topologies
title_fullStr Performance Analysis of Software-Defined Networking in Band Controllers for Different Network Topologies
title_full_unstemmed Performance Analysis of Software-Defined Networking in Band Controllers for Different Network Topologies
title_sort Performance Analysis of Software-Defined Networking in Band Controllers for Different Network Topologies
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Al-gubouri, Hussein Ali
author Al-gubouri, Hussein Ali
author_facet Al-gubouri, Hussein Ali
author_role author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv SDN
in band controllers
SDN topologies
SDN controllers
topic SDN
in band controllers
SDN topologies
SDN controllers
description With the great increase in the complexity of networking, software-defined networks have been developed to help administrators operate and configure network services with controllers such as Pox, Ryu, Floodlight and OpenDaylight. Those controllers offer an appropriate platform for applications that need high bandwidth. In this paper, several SDN controllers have been evaluated using in-band communication mode with different network topologies to check the performance of the in-band controllers. Some controllers cannot operate with an in-band controller such as Pox. The controllers were evaluated with Mininet by using iperf and ping networking tools, the packet latency round trip time RTT and the comparison of the throughput of the three topologies. The results of the experiments showed that in-band controllers can be implemented and have efficient results. Results showed that OpenDaylight has the lower value of RTT so it is the best for the applications that need fast response. Ryu has a greater bandwidth value, so it is the best for applications that need high bandwidth. Floodlight comes third in order, after OpenDaylight and Ryu, respectively.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024
2025
2025
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10366/162545
url http://hdl.handle.net/10366/162545
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca (España)
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Ediciones Universidad de Salamanca (España)
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:GREDOS. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Salamanca
instname:Universidad de Salamanca (USAL)
instname_str Universidad de Salamanca (USAL)
reponame_str GREDOS. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Salamanca
collection GREDOS. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de Salamanca
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869411834200588288
score 15,81155