Metadesacuerdos. La teoría del derecho frente al fenómeno de los desacuerdos jurídicos fundamentales
This doctoral thesis analyzes various philosophical treatments of the phenomenon of legal disagreements, particularly focusing on the exchange, based on it, stemming from Ronald Dworkin’s challenge to legal positivism. The thesis presents Dworkin’s initial attack to legal positivism grounded on the...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | tesis doctoral |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2017 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | CBUC, CESCA |
| Repositorio: | TDR. Tesis Doctorales en Red |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:www.tdx.cat:10803/434481 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/10803/434481 http://mediaserver.csuc.cat/tdx/documents/74/87/99/74879997744042934317531989000733920815/ |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Filosofia del dret Filosofía del derecho Philosophy of law Teoria del dret Teoría del derecho Theory of law Desacords Desacuerdos Disagreements Interpretació Interpretación Interpretation Anàlisi conceptual Análisis conceptual Conceptual analysis Metateoria Metateoría Metatheory 340 |
| Sumario: | This doctoral thesis analyzes various philosophical treatments of the phenomenon of legal disagreements, particularly focusing on the exchange, based on it, stemming from Ronald Dworkin’s challenge to legal positivism. The thesis presents Dworkin’s initial attack to legal positivism grounded on the idea that the latter is supposedly unable to account for disagreements in law, as well as Dworkin’s explanatory alternative to it, which involves developing a theoretical approach largely different (even opposed) to the positivist’s. After that, three different positivist replies are analyzed. All of them are critically scrutinized, but from their discussion I also collect elements which I finally use to try to offer 1) a more comprehensive and sophisticated framework for explaining the phenomenon of legal disagreements, and 2) a general reassessment of the discursive role pertaining to jurisprudence, in contrast to that pertaining to the participants of the legal practice |
|---|