Complexity, accuracy and fluency development through study abroad programmes varying in duration
Study abroad (SA) as an integral part of university studies is often seen by students, educators and institutions alike as an important means of boosting foreign language skills; yet, still little is known about how long of a stay abroad is long enough to see considerable gains in L2 proficiency. Th...
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | tesis doctoral |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2014 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | CBUC, CESCA |
| Repositorio: | TDR. Tesis Doctorales en Red |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:www.tdx.cat:10803/284229 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/10803/284229 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Adquisició segona llengua Llenguatge i llengües Estudiants estrangers Ensenyament Estudis a l'estranger Competència comunicativa 81 |
| Sumario: | Study abroad (SA) as an integral part of university studies is often seen by students, educators and institutions alike as an important means of boosting foreign language skills; yet, still little is known about how long of a stay abroad is long enough to see considerable gains in L2 proficiency. The present study explores the L2 oral development of a group of 47 adult learners of English as a foreign language who participated in SA programmes in English-speaking countries that differ in Length of stay (LoS). We compare the progress made by learners who went abroad for a quarter (approximately 3 months) with that of students who spent a semester abroad (approximately 6 months). We also examine the role students’ initial proficiency level, and experience abroad prior to the current SA had on linguistic outcomes. Learners’ oral production was elicited through a role-play task just prior to, and upon return from SA, and was analysed through measures of syntactic and lexical complexity, accuracy and fluency (CAF). The same task was performed by 24 native speakers of English in order to provide a baseline reference with which to compare learner performances. Results indicate that learners’ oral fluency increases considerably during SA. Lexical complexity moves toward more target-like use, and little change at all is observed in measures of syntactic complexity and accuracy as a result of SA. We did not find any compelling evidence to suggest that any one LoS was more beneficial than the other in terms of post-SA outcomes. Initial proficiency level was robustly impactful on post-test outcomes, and previous periods spent abroad only marginally influenced the outcome of the current SA period. |
|---|