COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures

Purpose: Systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) differ from reviews of interventions and diagnostic test accuracy studies and are complex. In fact, conducting a review of one or more PROMs comprises of multiple reviews (i.e., one review for each measurement property of each...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Authors: Prinsen, Cecilia A.C., Mokkink, Lidwine B., Bouter, Lex M., Alonso Caballero, Jordi, Patrick, Donald L., De Vet, Henrica C. W., Terwee, Caroline B.
Format: article
Status:Published version
Publication Date:2018
Country:España
Institution:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)
Repository:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
OAI Identifier:oai:recercat.cat:10230/35763
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10230/35763
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3
Access Level:Open access
Keyword:COSMIN
Systematic review
Measurement properties
PROM
Outcome measurement instrument
Outcome measures
Methodology
id ES_7cbbe5ddd9f353e5d3dbbe2012a5e6af
oai_identifier_str oai:recercat.cat:10230/35763
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measuresPrinsen, Cecilia A.C.Mokkink, Lidwine B.Bouter, Lex M.Alonso Caballero, JordiPatrick, Donald L.De Vet, Henrica C. W.Terwee, Caroline B.COSMINSystematic reviewMeasurement propertiesPROMOutcome measurement instrumentOutcome measuresMethodologyPurpose: Systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) differ from reviews of interventions and diagnostic test accuracy studies and are complex. In fact, conducting a review of one or more PROMs comprises of multiple reviews (i.e., one review for each measurement property of each PROM). In the absence of guidance specifically designed for reviews on measurement properties, our aim was to develop a guideline for conducting systematic reviews of PROMs. Methods: Based on literature reviews and expert opinions, and in concordance with existing guidelines, the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) steering committee developed a guideline for systematic reviews of PROMs. Results: A consecutive ten-step procedure for conducting a systematic review of PROMs is proposed. Steps 1–4 concern preparing and performing the literature search, and selecting relevant studies. Steps 5–8 concern the evaluation of the quality of the eligible studies, the measurement properties, and the interpretability and feasibility aspects. Steps 9 and 10 concern formulating recommendations and reporting the systematic review. Conclusions: The COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of PROMs includes methodology to combine the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties with the quality of the PROM itself (i.e., its measurement properties). This enables reviewers to draw transparent conclusions and making evidence-based recommendations on the quality of PROMs, and supports the evidence-based selection of PROMs for use in research and in clinical practiceCP has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme [FP7/2007-2013] under Grant Agreement No. 305081.Springer201820182018info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10230/35763http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3reponame:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunyainstname:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)InglésQuality of Life Research. 2018;27(5):1147-57info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7/305081© The Author(s) 2018. This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:recercat.cat:10230/357632026-05-29T05:05:01Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures
title COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures
spellingShingle COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures
Prinsen, Cecilia A.C.
COSMIN
Systematic review
Measurement properties
PROM
Outcome measurement instrument
Outcome measures
Methodology
title_short COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures
title_full COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures
title_fullStr COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures
title_full_unstemmed COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures
title_sort COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Prinsen, Cecilia A.C.
Mokkink, Lidwine B.
Bouter, Lex M.
Alonso Caballero, Jordi
Patrick, Donald L.
De Vet, Henrica C. W.
Terwee, Caroline B.
author Prinsen, Cecilia A.C.
author_facet Prinsen, Cecilia A.C.
Mokkink, Lidwine B.
Bouter, Lex M.
Alonso Caballero, Jordi
Patrick, Donald L.
De Vet, Henrica C. W.
Terwee, Caroline B.
author_role author
author2 Mokkink, Lidwine B.
Bouter, Lex M.
Alonso Caballero, Jordi
Patrick, Donald L.
De Vet, Henrica C. W.
Terwee, Caroline B.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv COSMIN
Systematic review
Measurement properties
PROM
Outcome measurement instrument
Outcome measures
Methodology
topic COSMIN
Systematic review
Measurement properties
PROM
Outcome measurement instrument
Outcome measures
Methodology
description Purpose: Systematic reviews of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) differ from reviews of interventions and diagnostic test accuracy studies and are complex. In fact, conducting a review of one or more PROMs comprises of multiple reviews (i.e., one review for each measurement property of each PROM). In the absence of guidance specifically designed for reviews on measurement properties, our aim was to develop a guideline for conducting systematic reviews of PROMs. Methods: Based on literature reviews and expert opinions, and in concordance with existing guidelines, the COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) steering committee developed a guideline for systematic reviews of PROMs. Results: A consecutive ten-step procedure for conducting a systematic review of PROMs is proposed. Steps 1–4 concern preparing and performing the literature search, and selecting relevant studies. Steps 5–8 concern the evaluation of the quality of the eligible studies, the measurement properties, and the interpretability and feasibility aspects. Steps 9 and 10 concern formulating recommendations and reporting the systematic review. Conclusions: The COSMIN guideline for systematic reviews of PROMs includes methodology to combine the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties with the quality of the PROM itself (i.e., its measurement properties). This enables reviewers to draw transparent conclusions and making evidence-based recommendations on the quality of PROMs, and supports the evidence-based selection of PROMs for use in research and in clinical practice
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018
2018
2018
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10230/35763
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3
url http://hdl.handle.net/10230/35763
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1798-3
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Quality of Life Research. 2018;27(5):1147-57
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/FP7/305081
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Springer
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
instname:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)
instname_str Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)
reponame_str Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
collection Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869411612208660480
score 15.811543

Similar Items