Constitutionalism vs. democracy: four readings. In defense of a "conversation among equals"
The tense relationship between constitutionalism and democracy has been a frequent topic of discussion among academics and politicians. In this Article, I present and critically discuss four different, contemporary approaches to this conflictive relationship between constitutionalism and democracy....
| Autor: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2025 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya) |
| Repositorio: | Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:dnet:recercat____::9f43dbe299399eb3a259feafb8cd9a92 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/10230/73187 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/til-2025-0024 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Democràcia Dret constitucional |
| Sumario: | The tense relationship between constitutionalism and democracy has been a frequent topic of discussion among academics and politicians. In this Article, I present and critically discuss four different, contemporary approaches to this conflictive relationship between constitutionalism and democracy. I shall call these four different responses: (i) against democracy; (ii) for constitutionalism (or "for constitutional restoration"); (iii) against constitutionalism; and (iv) for democracy (or "for democratic restoration"). In particular, I give some reasons in favor of (some version of) the latter position ("for democracy"), which I identify with the idea of a "conversation among equals." |
|---|