Valorisation of drinking water treatment sludge as substrate in subsurface flow constructed wetlands for upgrading treated wastewater

[EN] Drinking water treatment sludge (DWTS) is the main waste produced in drinking water treatment plants (DWTPs). Its valorisation as substrate for constructed wetlands (CWs) aimed at upgrading treated urban wastewater is presented. Keeping a holistic approach in mind, this study looks for nutrient...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Hernández Crespo, Carmen|||0000-0002-6727-0481, Martín Monerris, Miguel|||0000-0001-7464-9505, Oliver, Núria, Peña, María, Añó-Soto, Miguel
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2022
País:España
Institución:Universitat Politècnica de València (UPV)
Repositorio:RiuNet. Repositorio Institucional de la Universitat Politécnica de Valéncia
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:riunet.upv.es:10251/197949
Acceso en línea:https://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/197949
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Alum sludge
Treatment wetlands
Emerging pollutants
Upgrading treatment
Phosphorus removal
Pathogens removal
TECNOLOGIA DEL MEDIO AMBIENTE
Descripción
Sumario:[EN] Drinking water treatment sludge (DWTS) is the main waste produced in drinking water treatment plants (DWTPs). Its valorisation as substrate for constructed wetlands (CWs) aimed at upgrading treated urban wastewater is presented. Keeping a holistic approach in mind, this study looks for nutrient and organic matter removal but also contaminants of emerging concern (CECs) and pathogens. Three pilot subsurface flow CWs (1 m2) were installed under outdoor conditions in real WWTPs. Different operation modes (sequential: S-CW and continuous saturated flow: C-CW, CC-CW), different nutrient influent concentrations (SCW and C-CW: 0.6 mg TP/l, 12.7 mg TN/l; CC-CW: 6.5 mg TP/l, 48 mg TN/l) and high hydraulic loading rates (HLRs, 0.9-5.1 m3/m2/d) were tested. C-CW presented higher removal efficiencies than S-CW for TP (C-CW: 56-86%; S-CW: 32-66%), total nitrogen (C-CW: 23-38%; S-CW: -3 to 6%) and E. coli (C-CW: 94%; S-CW: 84%), while S-CW performed better for ammonium (C-CW: 29-45%; S-CW: 72-86%) and CECs removal. Among fifteen CECs monitored, most pharmaceuticals, four were significantly reduced in C-CW and nine in S-CW, which had more aerobic conditions. CC-CW reduced nutrients and organic matter by 62% (TP), 8% (TN), 23% and 40% (chemical and biochemical oxygen demands, respectively). The potential release of aluminium was negligible. Novel values for the first-order reaction coefficient of P-k-C* model are provided for the TP removal process using DWTS (0.6-1.0 h-1). The main conclusion is that DWTS is a suitable substrate to significantly upgrade WWTP effluents, even at high HLRs. A hybrid system combining sequential and continuous flow modes could optimize the upgrading treatment. A proposal for the full valorisation of the sludge produced in one DWTP is presented. (c) 2021 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.