Reliability and diagnostic accuracy of a new vaginal dynamometer to measure pelvic floor muscle strength

Aims: Assess the intrarater and interrater reliabilities and diagnostic accuracy of a new vaginal dynamometer to measure pelvic floor muscle (PFM) strength in incontinent and continent women. Methods: A test-retest reliability study including 152 female patients. Exclusion criteria: history of urge...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Romero Cullerés, Georgia, Peña Pitarch, Esteve|||0000-0001-5986-5728, Jané Feixas, Cecília, Vilaseca Grané, Ana, Montesinos Muñoz, Jesús, Arnau, Anna
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2020
País:España
Institución:Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC)
Repositorio:UPCommons. Portal del coneixement obert de la UPC
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:upcommons.upc.edu:2117/175442
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/2117/175442
https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000000796
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Dynamometer
Pelvic floor
Urinary incontinence
Muscle strength
Rehabilitation
Pelvic floor muscle strength
Dinamòmetre
Sòl pelvià
Incontinència urinària
Àrees temàtiques de la UPC::Enginyeria biomèdica::Aparells mèdics
Descripción
Sumario:Aims: Assess the intrarater and interrater reliabilities and diagnostic accuracy of a new vaginal dynamometer to measure pelvic floor muscle (PFM) strength in incontinent and continent women. Methods: A test-retest reliability study including 152 female patients. Exclusion criteria: history of urge urinary incontinence, prolapse of pelvic organ, pregnancy, previous urogynecological surgery, severe vaginal atrophy, or neurological conditions. The examination comprised digital assessment using the modified Oxford scale (MOS) and dynamometry measurements with a new prototype hand-held dynamometer. The MOS score ranges from 0 to 5: 0, no contraction; 1, flicker; 2, weak; 3, moderate; 4, good; 5, strong. Examinations were performed by a physiatrist, a physiotherapist and a midwife. The rest period between each rater measurement was 5 minutes. Assessment of intrarater and interrater reliability was calculated with the intraclass correlation coefficient.