Change in prefilter pressure as a key determinant in the decision to return blood in continuous renal replacement therapy: An observational study

BackgroundDuring continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), circuit coagulation is an important event that can result in suboptimal outcomes. Nurses must remain alert throughout the treatment and observe machine pressures. Transmembrane pressure (TMP) is commonly used for monitoring but it is some...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Mateos-Dávila A., Roig, AJB, Rodriguez, JAS, Guix-Comellas E.M.
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2023
País:España
Institución:Institut d’Investigació Biomèdica Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau)
Repositorio:r-IIB SANT PAU. Repositorio Institucional de Producción Científica del Instituto de Investigación Biomédica Sant Pau
OAI Identifier:oai:iibsantpau.fundanetsuite.com:p16288
Acceso en línea:https://iibsantpau.fundanetsuite.com/Publicaciones/ProdCientif/PublicacionFrw.aspx?id=16288
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85161410169&doi=10.1111%2fnicc.12933&partnerID=40&md5=420eed413c621872cbbf0c442a79cfe8
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:acute renal failure (ARF)
circuit coagulation
circuit lifespan
continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT)
prefilter
filter pressure (FP)
Descripción
Sumario:BackgroundDuring continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), circuit coagulation is an important event that can result in suboptimal outcomes. Nurses must remain alert throughout the treatment and observe machine pressures. Transmembrane pressure (TMP) is commonly used for monitoring but it is sometimes too late to return blood to the patient.AimTo compare the capacity of prefilter pressure (FP) versus TMP to predict the risk of circuit coagulation in adult patients with acute renal failure on CRRT.Study DesignAn observational, longitudinal, prospective study. This study was carried out in a tertiary referral hospital over 2 years. Data collected included the following variables: TMP, filter or FP, effluent pressure, venous and arterial pressure, filtration fraction, and ultrafiltration constant of each circuit. Means and their trends over time were collected, for both diffusive and convective therapy and for two membrane types.ResultsA total of 151 circuits (24 polysulfone and 127 acrylonitrile) were analysed, from 71 patients (n = 22 [34%] women; mean age, 66.5 [36-84] years). Of the total treatments, 80 were diffusive, and the rest were convective or mixed. In the diffusive circuits, a progressive rise in FP was observed without an increase in TMP and with an increasing trend in effluent pressure. Circuit lifespan was between 2 and 90 h. In 11% (n = 17) of the cases, the blood could not be returned to the patient.ConclusionThese findings allowed the creation of graphs that indicate the appropriate point to return blood to the patient. FP was a major determinant in this decision; in most cases, TMP was not a reliable parameter. Our findings are applicable to convective, diffusive, and mixed treatments as well as both types of membranes used in this acute setting.Relevance to Clinical PracticeThis study provides two clear reference graphs showing risk scales for the assessment of circuit pressures in CRRT. The graphs proposed here can be used to evaluate any machine on the market and the two types of membranes used in this acute setting. Both convective and diffusive circuits can be assessed, allowing safer evaluation in patients who change treatment.