Environmental performance of a multi-energy liquid air energy storage (LAES) system in cogeneration asset – A life cycle assessment-based comparison with lithium ion (Li-ion) battery
Increase in energy demand is shaping both developed and developing countries globally. As a result, the endeavour to reduce carbon emissions also encompasses electrical energy storage systems to ensure environmentally friendly power production and distribution. Currently, the scientific community is...
| Autores: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2024 |
| País: | España |
| Recursos: | Universitat de Lleida (UdL) |
| Repositorio: | Repositori Obert UdL |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:repositori.udl.cat:10459.1/466913 |
| Acesso em linha: | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39193 https://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/466913 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palavra-chave: | Liquid air energy storage (LAES) Life cycle assessment (LCA) Electrical energy storage Carnot battery Li-ion battery Thermal energy storage (TES) Cogeneration District cooling |
| id |
ES_7992270ba044e2acc162c06eeff053be |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositori.udl.cat:10459.1/466913 |
| network_acronym_str |
ES |
| network_name_str |
España |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
Environmental performance of a multi-energy liquid air energy storage (LAES) system in cogeneration asset – A life cycle assessment-based comparison with lithium ion (Li-ion) batteryTafone, AlessioBorri, EmilianoCabeza, Luisa F.Romagnoli, AlessandroLiquid air energy storage (LAES)Life cycle assessment (LCA)Electrical energy storageCarnot batteryLi-ion batteryThermal energy storage (TES)CogenerationDistrict coolingIncrease in energy demand is shaping both developed and developing countries globally. As a result, the endeavour to reduce carbon emissions also encompasses electrical energy storage systems to ensure environmentally friendly power production and distribution. Currently, the scientific community is actively exploring and developing new storage technologies for this purpose. The focus of this work is to compare the eco-friendliness of a relatively novel technology such as liquid air energy storage (LAES) with an established storage solution such as Li-Ion battery (Li-ion). The comparison is carried out through Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology which aims to assess the environmental impacts from each life stage, according to different impact categories. In particular, the study refers to the unitary storage and the delivery of electricity as well as cooling energy, considering all the inefficiencies and limits of each technology. The results show that in the full electric case study Li-ion battery environmentally outperform LAES due to (1) the higher round trip efficiency and (2) the significantly high environmental impact of the diathermic oil utilized by LAES, accounting for 92 % of the manufacture and disposal phase. Conversely, the cogeneration case study highlights that the “flexibility” and “dualism” of LAES, capable to efficiently deliver both electricity and cooling, offset the impact related to the higher electricity consumption during the use phase. Notably in energy mix frameworks with high share of primary energy source from fossil fuels, cogenerative LAES demonstrates superior environmental performance compared to Li-ion battery (i.e. 1302 kgCO2eq/MWhe vs 1140 kgCO2eq/MWhe for Singapore energy mix), attributable to its reduced electricity consumption.This project was funded by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Programme under No. 101007976 (COCOOL). This work is partially supported by ICREA under the ICREA Academia programme. This work is also partially funded by Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion´ —Agencia Estatal de Investigacion ´ (AEI) (PID2021- 123511OB-C31 - MCIN/AEI/10.13039/ 501100011033/FEDER, EU and RED2022-134219-T). The authors at the University of Lleida would like to thank the Catalan Government for the quality accreditation given to their research group GREiA (2021 SGR 01615). GREiA is a certified agent TECNIO in the category of technology developers from the Government of Catalonia.Elsevier2024info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39193https://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/466913reponame:Repositori Obert UdL instname:Universitat de Lleida (UdL)Inglésinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/AEI/Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2021-2023/PID2021-123511OB-C31info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/AEI/Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2021-2023/RED2022-134219-TReproducció del document publicat a https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39193Heliyon, 2024, vol. 10, núm. 20, e39193info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/101007976cc-by (c) Alessio Tafone et al., 2024Attribution 4.0 Internationalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccesshttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/oai:repositori.udl.cat:10459.1/4669132026-06-24T12:42:17Z |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Environmental performance of a multi-energy liquid air energy storage (LAES) system in cogeneration asset – A life cycle assessment-based comparison with lithium ion (Li-ion) battery |
| title |
Environmental performance of a multi-energy liquid air energy storage (LAES) system in cogeneration asset – A life cycle assessment-based comparison with lithium ion (Li-ion) battery |
| spellingShingle |
Environmental performance of a multi-energy liquid air energy storage (LAES) system in cogeneration asset – A life cycle assessment-based comparison with lithium ion (Li-ion) battery Tafone, Alessio Liquid air energy storage (LAES) Life cycle assessment (LCA) Electrical energy storage Carnot battery Li-ion battery Thermal energy storage (TES) Cogeneration District cooling |
| title_short |
Environmental performance of a multi-energy liquid air energy storage (LAES) system in cogeneration asset – A life cycle assessment-based comparison with lithium ion (Li-ion) battery |
| title_full |
Environmental performance of a multi-energy liquid air energy storage (LAES) system in cogeneration asset – A life cycle assessment-based comparison with lithium ion (Li-ion) battery |
| title_fullStr |
Environmental performance of a multi-energy liquid air energy storage (LAES) system in cogeneration asset – A life cycle assessment-based comparison with lithium ion (Li-ion) battery |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Environmental performance of a multi-energy liquid air energy storage (LAES) system in cogeneration asset – A life cycle assessment-based comparison with lithium ion (Li-ion) battery |
| title_sort |
Environmental performance of a multi-energy liquid air energy storage (LAES) system in cogeneration asset – A life cycle assessment-based comparison with lithium ion (Li-ion) battery |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Tafone, Alessio Borri, Emiliano Cabeza, Luisa F. Romagnoli, Alessandro |
| author |
Tafone, Alessio |
| author_facet |
Tafone, Alessio Borri, Emiliano Cabeza, Luisa F. Romagnoli, Alessandro |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Borri, Emiliano Cabeza, Luisa F. Romagnoli, Alessandro |
| author2_role |
author author author |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Liquid air energy storage (LAES) Life cycle assessment (LCA) Electrical energy storage Carnot battery Li-ion battery Thermal energy storage (TES) Cogeneration District cooling |
| topic |
Liquid air energy storage (LAES) Life cycle assessment (LCA) Electrical energy storage Carnot battery Li-ion battery Thermal energy storage (TES) Cogeneration District cooling |
| description |
Increase in energy demand is shaping both developed and developing countries globally. As a result, the endeavour to reduce carbon emissions also encompasses electrical energy storage systems to ensure environmentally friendly power production and distribution. Currently, the scientific community is actively exploring and developing new storage technologies for this purpose. The focus of this work is to compare the eco-friendliness of a relatively novel technology such as liquid air energy storage (LAES) with an established storage solution such as Li-Ion battery (Li-ion). The comparison is carried out through Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) methodology which aims to assess the environmental impacts from each life stage, according to different impact categories. In particular, the study refers to the unitary storage and the delivery of electricity as well as cooling energy, considering all the inefficiencies and limits of each technology. The results show that in the full electric case study Li-ion battery environmentally outperform LAES due to (1) the higher round trip efficiency and (2) the significantly high environmental impact of the diathermic oil utilized by LAES, accounting for 92 % of the manufacture and disposal phase. Conversely, the cogeneration case study highlights that the “flexibility” and “dualism” of LAES, capable to efficiently deliver both electricity and cooling, offset the impact related to the higher electricity consumption during the use phase. Notably in energy mix frameworks with high share of primary energy source from fossil fuels, cogenerative LAES demonstrates superior environmental performance compared to Li-ion battery (i.e. 1302 kgCO2eq/MWhe vs 1140 kgCO2eq/MWhe for Singapore energy mix), attributable to its reduced electricity consumption. |
| publishDate |
2024 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39193 https://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/466913 |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39193 https://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/466913 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
Inglés |
| language_invalid_str_mv |
Inglés |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/AEI/Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2021-2023/PID2021-123511OB-C31 info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/AEI/Plan Estatal de Investigación Científica y Técnica y de Innovación 2021-2023/RED2022-134219-T Reproducció del document publicat a https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39193 Heliyon, 2024, vol. 10, núm. 20, e39193 info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/101007976 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
cc-by (c) Alessio Tafone et al., 2024 Attribution 4.0 International info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
cc-by (c) Alessio Tafone et al., 2024 Attribution 4.0 International http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositori Obert UdL instname:Universitat de Lleida (UdL) |
| instname_str |
Universitat de Lleida (UdL) |
| reponame_str |
Repositori Obert UdL |
| collection |
Repositori Obert UdL |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1869411359256477696 |
| score |
15,812429 |