Diagnostic criteria for bruxism: A scoping review

Background: A scoping review was conducted to explore all the methods and criteria used in primary research on bruxism diagnosis. Methods: A pre-defined and validated search was carried out in the PubMed, CINAHL, PsycInfo, Scopus, PeDro, LILACS, and Epistemonikos databases. Primary studies conducted...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Padrós Augé, Jordi, Zayane, Nouhaila, Cano, Miquel, Morales Vigo, Albert, Castro, Sebastién, Parathias, Laurine
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2023
País:España
Institución:Universidad de Barcelona
Repositorio:Dipòsit Digital de la UB
OAI Identifier:oai:diposit.ub.edu:2445/209740
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/2445/209740
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Bruxisme
Diagnòstic
Bruxism
Diagnosis
id ES_78b4bf5c8b5ec4ffd846b20fb646bbec
oai_identifier_str oai:diposit.ub.edu:2445/209740
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Diagnostic criteria for bruxism: A scoping reviewPadrós Augé, JordiZayane, NouhailaCano, MiquelMorales Vigo, AlbertCastro, SebastiénParathias, LaurineBruxismeDiagnòsticBruxismDiagnosisBackground: A scoping review was conducted to explore all the methods and criteria used in primary research on bruxism diagnosis. Methods: A pre-defined and validated search was carried out in the PubMed, CINAHL, PsycInfo, Scopus, PeDro, LILACS, and Epistemonikos databases. Primary studies conducted on bruxism as primary condition in the adult population were included. The selection phases were carried out by peers, and conflicts were resolved by a third reviewer or by consensus. Data extraction and manual tracing were done in order to identify the relevant studies. Results: The search and selection strategy identified 472 publications, and after manual tracing, 423 studies were selected for analysis. The results on diagnostic methods were grouped into 10 categories. Different subcategories were described within these categories, resulting in a total of 73 diagnostic methods: physical examination (n = 11), questionnaires (n = 12), polysomnography (n = 13), electromyography (n = 5), the International Classification for Sleep Disorders from the American Association of Sleep Medicine (ICSD-AASM) (n = 3), intraoral devices (n = 10), history (n = 7), audio-video recordings (n = 3), smartphone applications (n = 2), and others (n = 7). In addition, the combinations of methods used in the primary research were also analyzed. The prevalence of use was calculated for all diagnostic categories and subcategories, as well as for the combinations. Conclusion: There was high heterogeneity in primary research regarding the diagnosis of bruxism. There is evidence that not all diagnostic methods are properly validated. Future research should focus on validating these methods and developing the best tool in terms of reliability and cost-effectiveness for the diagnosis of bruxism.Maad Rayan Publishing Company2023info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/2445/209740Articles publicats en revistes (Institut d'lnvestigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL))reponame:Dipòsit Digital de la UBinstname:Universidad de BarcelonaInglésReproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.34172/johoe.2023.17Journal of Oral Health and Oral Epidemiology, 2023, vol. 12, num. 3, p. 98-104https://doi.org/10.34172/johoe.2023.17cc by (c) Padrós Augé, Jordi et al, 2023http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:diposit.ub.edu:2445/2097402026-05-27T06:46:51Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Diagnostic criteria for bruxism: A scoping review
title Diagnostic criteria for bruxism: A scoping review
spellingShingle Diagnostic criteria for bruxism: A scoping review
Padrós Augé, Jordi
Bruxisme
Diagnòstic
Bruxism
Diagnosis
title_short Diagnostic criteria for bruxism: A scoping review
title_full Diagnostic criteria for bruxism: A scoping review
title_fullStr Diagnostic criteria for bruxism: A scoping review
title_full_unstemmed Diagnostic criteria for bruxism: A scoping review
title_sort Diagnostic criteria for bruxism: A scoping review
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Padrós Augé, Jordi
Zayane, Nouhaila
Cano, Miquel
Morales Vigo, Albert
Castro, Sebastién
Parathias, Laurine
author Padrós Augé, Jordi
author_facet Padrós Augé, Jordi
Zayane, Nouhaila
Cano, Miquel
Morales Vigo, Albert
Castro, Sebastién
Parathias, Laurine
author_role author
author2 Zayane, Nouhaila
Cano, Miquel
Morales Vigo, Albert
Castro, Sebastién
Parathias, Laurine
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Bruxisme
Diagnòstic
Bruxism
Diagnosis
topic Bruxisme
Diagnòstic
Bruxism
Diagnosis
description Background: A scoping review was conducted to explore all the methods and criteria used in primary research on bruxism diagnosis. Methods: A pre-defined and validated search was carried out in the PubMed, CINAHL, PsycInfo, Scopus, PeDro, LILACS, and Epistemonikos databases. Primary studies conducted on bruxism as primary condition in the adult population were included. The selection phases were carried out by peers, and conflicts were resolved by a third reviewer or by consensus. Data extraction and manual tracing were done in order to identify the relevant studies. Results: The search and selection strategy identified 472 publications, and after manual tracing, 423 studies were selected for analysis. The results on diagnostic methods were grouped into 10 categories. Different subcategories were described within these categories, resulting in a total of 73 diagnostic methods: physical examination (n = 11), questionnaires (n = 12), polysomnography (n = 13), electromyography (n = 5), the International Classification for Sleep Disorders from the American Association of Sleep Medicine (ICSD-AASM) (n = 3), intraoral devices (n = 10), history (n = 7), audio-video recordings (n = 3), smartphone applications (n = 2), and others (n = 7). In addition, the combinations of methods used in the primary research were also analyzed. The prevalence of use was calculated for all diagnostic categories and subcategories, as well as for the combinations. Conclusion: There was high heterogeneity in primary research regarding the diagnosis of bruxism. There is evidence that not all diagnostic methods are properly validated. Future research should focus on validating these methods and developing the best tool in terms of reliability and cost-effectiveness for the diagnosis of bruxism.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/2445/209740
url https://hdl.handle.net/2445/209740
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Reproducció del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.34172/johoe.2023.17
Journal of Oral Health and Oral Epidemiology, 2023, vol. 12, num. 3, p. 98-104
https://doi.org/10.34172/johoe.2023.17
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv cc by (c) Padrós Augé, Jordi et al, 2023
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv cc by (c) Padrós Augé, Jordi et al, 2023
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/es/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Maad Rayan Publishing Company
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Maad Rayan Publishing Company
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Articles publicats en revistes (Institut d'lnvestigació Biomèdica de Bellvitge (IDIBELL))
reponame:Dipòsit Digital de la UB
instname:Universidad de Barcelona
instname_str Universidad de Barcelona
reponame_str Dipòsit Digital de la UB
collection Dipòsit Digital de la UB
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869411280552460289
score 15,298079

Similares en LA Referencia