Which changes are needed to render all genera of the German lora monophyletic?
53 p., gráf.
| Autores: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2016 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC) |
| Repositorio: | DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:digital.csic.es:10261/139337 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/10261/139337 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Classification Generic circumscription German flora Monophyly Phylogeny |
| id |
ES_75c01cf2baa85d1dbbbf1874eecb5100 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:digital.csic.es:10261/139337 |
| network_acronym_str |
ES |
| network_name_str |
España |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
Which changes are needed to render all genera of the German lora monophyletic?Kadereit, Joachim W.Albach, Dirk C.Ehrendorfer, FriedrichGalbany-Casals, MercèGarcia-Jacas, NúriaGarcia-Jacas, NúriaGehrke, BeritKadereit, GudrunKilian, NorbertKlein, Johannes T.Koch, Marcus A.Kropf, MatthiasOberprieler, ChristophPirie, Michael D.Ritz, Christiane M.Röser, MartinSpalik, KrzysztofSusanna de la Serna, AlfonsoWeigend, MaximilianWelk, ErikWesche, KarstenZhang, Li-BingDillenberger, Markus S.ClassificationGeneric circumscriptionGerman floraMonophylyPhylogeny53 p., gráf.The use of DNA sequence data in plant systematics has brought us closer than ever to formulating well-founded hypotheses about phylogenetic relationships, and phylogenetic research keeps on revealing that plant genera as traditionally circumscribed often are not monophyletic. Here, we assess the monophyly of all genera of vascular plants found in Germany. Using a survey of the phylogenetic literature, we discuss which classifications would be consistent with the phylogenetic relationships found and could be followed, provided monophyly is accepted as the primary criterion for circumscribing taxa. We indicate whether and which names are available when changes in generic assignment are made (but do not present a comprehensive review of the nomenclatural aspects of such names). Among the 840 genera examined, we identified c. 140 where data quality is sufficiently high to conclude that they are not monophyletic, and an additional c. 20 where monophyly is questionable but where data quality is not yet sufficient to reach convincing conclusions. While it is still fiercely debated how a phylogenetic tree should be translated into a classification, our results could serve as a guide to the likely consequences of systematic research for the taxonomy of the German flora and the floras of neighbouring countries.Peer reviewedBotanic Garden and Botanical Museum BerlinConsejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas [https://ror.org/02gfc7t72]201620162016info:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501http://hdl.handle.net/10261/139337reponame:DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSICinstname:Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)Ingléshttp://dx.doi.org/10.3372/wi.46.46105Síinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:digital.csic.es:10261/1393372026-05-22T06:33:51Z |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Which changes are needed to render all genera of the German lora monophyletic? |
| title |
Which changes are needed to render all genera of the German lora monophyletic? |
| spellingShingle |
Which changes are needed to render all genera of the German lora monophyletic? Kadereit, Joachim W. Classification Generic circumscription German flora Monophyly Phylogeny |
| title_short |
Which changes are needed to render all genera of the German lora monophyletic? |
| title_full |
Which changes are needed to render all genera of the German lora monophyletic? |
| title_fullStr |
Which changes are needed to render all genera of the German lora monophyletic? |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Which changes are needed to render all genera of the German lora monophyletic? |
| title_sort |
Which changes are needed to render all genera of the German lora monophyletic? |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Kadereit, Joachim W. Albach, Dirk C. Ehrendorfer, Friedrich Galbany-Casals, Mercè Garcia-Jacas, Núria Garcia-Jacas, Núria Gehrke, Berit Kadereit, Gudrun Kilian, Norbert Klein, Johannes T. Koch, Marcus A. Kropf, Matthias Oberprieler, Christoph Pirie, Michael D. Ritz, Christiane M. Röser, Martin Spalik, Krzysztof Susanna de la Serna, Alfonso Weigend, Maximilian Welk, Erik Wesche, Karsten Zhang, Li-Bing Dillenberger, Markus S. |
| author |
Kadereit, Joachim W. |
| author_facet |
Kadereit, Joachim W. Albach, Dirk C. Ehrendorfer, Friedrich Galbany-Casals, Mercè Garcia-Jacas, Núria Gehrke, Berit Kadereit, Gudrun Kilian, Norbert Klein, Johannes T. Koch, Marcus A. Kropf, Matthias Oberprieler, Christoph Pirie, Michael D. Ritz, Christiane M. Röser, Martin Spalik, Krzysztof Susanna de la Serna, Alfonso Weigend, Maximilian Welk, Erik Wesche, Karsten Zhang, Li-Bing Dillenberger, Markus S. |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Albach, Dirk C. Ehrendorfer, Friedrich Galbany-Casals, Mercè Garcia-Jacas, Núria Gehrke, Berit Kadereit, Gudrun Kilian, Norbert Klein, Johannes T. Koch, Marcus A. Kropf, Matthias Oberprieler, Christoph Pirie, Michael D. Ritz, Christiane M. Röser, Martin Spalik, Krzysztof Susanna de la Serna, Alfonso Weigend, Maximilian Welk, Erik Wesche, Karsten Zhang, Li-Bing Dillenberger, Markus S. |
| author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author author |
| dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas [https://ror.org/02gfc7t72] |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Classification Generic circumscription German flora Monophyly Phylogeny |
| topic |
Classification Generic circumscription German flora Monophyly Phylogeny |
| description |
53 p., gráf. |
| publishDate |
2016 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016 2016 2016 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 |
| format |
article |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10261/139337 |
| url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10261/139337 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
Inglés |
| language_invalid_str_mv |
Inglés |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://dx.doi.org/10.3372/wi.46.46105 Sí |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Botanic Garden and Botanical Museum Berlin |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Botanic Garden and Botanical Museum Berlin |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC instname:Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC) |
| instname_str |
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC) |
| reponame_str |
DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC |
| collection |
DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1869411002600128512 |
| score |
15,811543 |