Predictive Model for the Diagnosis of Uterine Prolapse Based on Transperineal Ultrasound
We want to describe a model that allows the use of transperineal ultrasound to define the probability of experiencing uterine prolapse (UP). This was a prospective observational study involving 107 patients with UP or cervical elongation (CE) without UP. The ultrasound study was performed using tran...
| Autores: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2022 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universidad de Sevilla (US) |
| Repositorio: | idUS. Depósito de Investigación de la Universidad de Sevilla |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:idus.us.es:11441/145720 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://hdl.handle.net/11441/145720 https://doi.org/10.3390/tomography8040144 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | 3D Transperineal ultrasound Pelvic organ prolapse Uterine prolapse (UP) Cervical elongation Pelvic floor |
| id |
ES_7597da52186fcff9a46b7a11bc32cb39 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:idus.us.es:11441/145720 |
| network_acronym_str |
ES |
| network_name_str |
España |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
Predictive Model for the Diagnosis of Uterine Prolapse Based on Transperineal UltrasoundGarcía Mejido, José AntonioRamos Vega, ZenaidaFernández Palacín, AnaBorrero González, CarlotaValdivia, MaribelPelayo Delgado, IreneSáinz Bueno, José Antonio3D Transperineal ultrasoundPelvic organ prolapseUterine prolapse (UP)Cervical elongationPelvic floorWe want to describe a model that allows the use of transperineal ultrasound to define the probability of experiencing uterine prolapse (UP). This was a prospective observational study involving 107 patients with UP or cervical elongation (CE) without UP. The ultrasound study was performed using transperineal ultrasound and evaluated the differences in the pubis–uterine fundus distance at rest and with the Valsalva maneuver. We generated different multivariate binary logistic regression models using nonautomated methods to predict UP, including the difference in the pubis–uterine fundus distance at rest and with the Valsalva maneuver. The parameters were added progressively according to their simplicity of use and their predictive capacity for identifying UP. We used two binary logistic regression models to predict UP. Model 1 was based on the difference in the pubis–uterine fundus distance at rest and with the Valsalva maneuver and the age of the patient [AUC: 0.967 (95% CI, 0.939–0.995; p < 0.0005)]. Model 2 used the difference in the pubis–uterine fundus distance at rest and with the Valsalva maneuver, age, avulsion and ballooning [AUC: 0.971 (95% CI, 0.945–0.997; p < 0.0005)]. In conclusion, the model based on the difference in the pubis– uterine fundus distance at rest and with the Valsalva maneuver and the age of the patient could predict 96.7% of patients with UP.MDPICirugíaMedicina Preventiva y Salud Pública2022info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/11441/145720https://doi.org/10.3390/tomography8040144reponame:idUS. Depósito de Investigación de la Universidad de Sevillainstname:Universidad de Sevilla (US)InglésTomography, 8 (4), 1716-1725.https://www.mdpi.com/2379-139X/8/4/144info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:idus.us.es:11441/1457202026-06-17T12:51:07Z |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Predictive Model for the Diagnosis of Uterine Prolapse Based on Transperineal Ultrasound |
| title |
Predictive Model for the Diagnosis of Uterine Prolapse Based on Transperineal Ultrasound |
| spellingShingle |
Predictive Model for the Diagnosis of Uterine Prolapse Based on Transperineal Ultrasound García Mejido, José Antonio 3D Transperineal ultrasound Pelvic organ prolapse Uterine prolapse (UP) Cervical elongation Pelvic floor |
| title_short |
Predictive Model for the Diagnosis of Uterine Prolapse Based on Transperineal Ultrasound |
| title_full |
Predictive Model for the Diagnosis of Uterine Prolapse Based on Transperineal Ultrasound |
| title_fullStr |
Predictive Model for the Diagnosis of Uterine Prolapse Based on Transperineal Ultrasound |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Predictive Model for the Diagnosis of Uterine Prolapse Based on Transperineal Ultrasound |
| title_sort |
Predictive Model for the Diagnosis of Uterine Prolapse Based on Transperineal Ultrasound |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
García Mejido, José Antonio Ramos Vega, Zenaida Fernández Palacín, Ana Borrero González, Carlota Valdivia, Maribel Pelayo Delgado, Irene Sáinz Bueno, José Antonio |
| author |
García Mejido, José Antonio |
| author_facet |
García Mejido, José Antonio Ramos Vega, Zenaida Fernández Palacín, Ana Borrero González, Carlota Valdivia, Maribel Pelayo Delgado, Irene Sáinz Bueno, José Antonio |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Ramos Vega, Zenaida Fernández Palacín, Ana Borrero González, Carlota Valdivia, Maribel Pelayo Delgado, Irene Sáinz Bueno, José Antonio |
| author2_role |
author author author author author author |
| dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Cirugía Medicina Preventiva y Salud Pública |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
3D Transperineal ultrasound Pelvic organ prolapse Uterine prolapse (UP) Cervical elongation Pelvic floor |
| topic |
3D Transperineal ultrasound Pelvic organ prolapse Uterine prolapse (UP) Cervical elongation Pelvic floor |
| description |
We want to describe a model that allows the use of transperineal ultrasound to define the probability of experiencing uterine prolapse (UP). This was a prospective observational study involving 107 patients with UP or cervical elongation (CE) without UP. The ultrasound study was performed using transperineal ultrasound and evaluated the differences in the pubis–uterine fundus distance at rest and with the Valsalva maneuver. We generated different multivariate binary logistic regression models using nonautomated methods to predict UP, including the difference in the pubis–uterine fundus distance at rest and with the Valsalva maneuver. The parameters were added progressively according to their simplicity of use and their predictive capacity for identifying UP. We used two binary logistic regression models to predict UP. Model 1 was based on the difference in the pubis–uterine fundus distance at rest and with the Valsalva maneuver and the age of the patient [AUC: 0.967 (95% CI, 0.939–0.995; p < 0.0005)]. Model 2 used the difference in the pubis–uterine fundus distance at rest and with the Valsalva maneuver, age, avulsion and ballooning [AUC: 0.971 (95% CI, 0.945–0.997; p < 0.0005)]. In conclusion, the model based on the difference in the pubis– uterine fundus distance at rest and with the Valsalva maneuver and the age of the patient could predict 96.7% of patients with UP. |
| publishDate |
2022 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
https://hdl.handle.net/11441/145720 https://doi.org/10.3390/tomography8040144 |
| url |
https://hdl.handle.net/11441/145720 https://doi.org/10.3390/tomography8040144 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
Inglés |
| language_invalid_str_mv |
Inglés |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Tomography, 8 (4), 1716-1725. https://www.mdpi.com/2379-139X/8/4/144 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
MDPI |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
MDPI |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:idUS. Depósito de Investigación de la Universidad de Sevilla instname:Universidad de Sevilla (US) |
| instname_str |
Universidad de Sevilla (US) |
| reponame_str |
idUS. Depósito de Investigación de la Universidad de Sevilla |
| collection |
idUS. Depósito de Investigación de la Universidad de Sevilla |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1869410991572254720 |
| score |
15,300724 |