Remedies for Unfair Terms in Light of the General Principles of EU Law

This paper presents the status quo of the consequences for unfair terms (Art. 6(1) of Directive 93/13, on unfair terms in consumer contracts, UCTD), according to the interpretation of the European Court of Justice (ECJ). In that task, it provides reasons for seemingly contradictory judgments and eng...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor: Elizalde, Francisco de
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2024
País:España
Institución:IE
Repositorio:Repositorio IE
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorio.ie.edu:20.500.14417/4108
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14417/4108
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:56 Ciencias Jurídicas y Derecho
ODS 16 - Paz, justicia e instituciones sólidas
id ES_751ef3571ca6eb1787975b8ef9d91413
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ie.edu:20.500.14417/4108
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Remedies for Unfair Terms in Light of the General Principles of EU LawElizalde, Francisco de56 Ciencias Jurídicas y DerechoODS 16 - Paz, justicia e instituciones sólidasThis paper presents the status quo of the consequences for unfair terms (Art. 6(1) of Directive 93/13, on unfair terms in consumer contracts, UCTD), according to the interpretation of the European Court of Justice (ECJ). In that task, it provides reasons for seemingly contradictory judgments and engages with inconsistent rulings. To navigate these troubled waters, the paper refers to the general principles of EU law, even beyond those that are explicit in the ECJ’s decisions. It is claimed here that those general principles explain the evolution of the remedy for unfair terms and its follow-on consequences. They could also bring light to the clashes between EU law and national private law in the application of the UCTD.YesPublishedWolters Kluwerhttps://ror.org/02jjdwm7520262024info:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/mswordapplication/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.documenthttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14417/4108reponame:Repositorio IEinstname:IEInglésIE Law SchoolIE UniversityPrivate & Business LawAttribution 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:repositorio.ie.edu:20.500.14417/41082026-06-15T12:40:57Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Remedies for Unfair Terms in Light of the General Principles of EU Law
title Remedies for Unfair Terms in Light of the General Principles of EU Law
spellingShingle Remedies for Unfair Terms in Light of the General Principles of EU Law
Elizalde, Francisco de
56 Ciencias Jurídicas y Derecho
ODS 16 - Paz, justicia e instituciones sólidas
title_short Remedies for Unfair Terms in Light of the General Principles of EU Law
title_full Remedies for Unfair Terms in Light of the General Principles of EU Law
title_fullStr Remedies for Unfair Terms in Light of the General Principles of EU Law
title_full_unstemmed Remedies for Unfair Terms in Light of the General Principles of EU Law
title_sort Remedies for Unfair Terms in Light of the General Principles of EU Law
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Elizalde, Francisco de
author Elizalde, Francisco de
author_facet Elizalde, Francisco de
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv https://ror.org/02jjdwm75
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv 56 Ciencias Jurídicas y Derecho
ODS 16 - Paz, justicia e instituciones sólidas
topic 56 Ciencias Jurídicas y Derecho
ODS 16 - Paz, justicia e instituciones sólidas
description This paper presents the status quo of the consequences for unfair terms (Art. 6(1) of Directive 93/13, on unfair terms in consumer contracts, UCTD), according to the interpretation of the European Court of Justice (ECJ). In that task, it provides reasons for seemingly contradictory judgments and engages with inconsistent rulings. To navigate these troubled waters, the paper refers to the general principles of EU law, even beyond those that are explicit in the ECJ’s decisions. It is claimed here that those general principles explain the evolution of the remedy for unfair terms and its follow-on consequences. They could also bring light to the clashes between EU law and national private law in the application of the UCTD.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024
2026
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14417/4108
url https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14417/4108
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv IE Law School
IE University
Private & Business Law
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Attribution 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/msword
application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wolters Kluwer
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wolters Kluwer
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositorio IE
instname:IE
instname_str IE
reponame_str Repositorio IE
collection Repositorio IE
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869410957938130944
score 15.812429

Similares en LA Referencia