Measuring forgiveness. A systematic review

Forgiveness is frequently investigated, and many methods of assessment have been used. However, discerning which methods of assessment to use for which purposes has generally not been based on systematic analysis. We searched four databases: Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and PsycINFO. Forgiveness...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Fernandez Capo, Maria, Recoder, Silvia, Gámiz, María, Gómez-Benito, Juana, Worthington, Everett
Tipo de documento: artigo
Data de publicação:2017
País:España
Recursos:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)
Repositório:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
OAI Identifier:oai:recercat.cat:20.500.12328/5185
Acesso em linha:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12328/5185
https://dx.doi.org/10.1027/1016-9040/a000303
Access Level:Acesso embargado
Palavra-chave:Forgiveness
Forgivingness
Assessment
Instruments
Systematic review
Perdón
Evaluación
Instrumentos
Revisión sistemática
Perdó
Avaluació
Revisió sistemàtica
159.9
Descrição
Resumo:Forgiveness is frequently investigated, and many methods of assessment have been used. However, discerning which methods of assessment to use for which purposes has generally not been based on systematic analysis. We searched four databases: Scopus, Web of Science, PubMed, and PsycINFO. Forgiveness measures were grouped into Forgiveness Scales (i.e., Dispositional Forgiveness, Episodic Forgiveness, and Dyadic Forgiveness) and Other Measures of Forgiveness (i.e., implicit, behavioral, and biological measures). We reviewed original articles that describe the development of 45 measures and compiled psychometric information (including instrument language and availability, original samples, instrument composition, estimated reliabilities of scores, evidence of construct validity, and an evaluation of each measure). Also, our review suggests a nomological network of associations regarding the construct validity of interpreting scores as forgiveness. Those associations inform the concept of forgiveness, describing which and how variables are associated with this construct. We evaluate the level of sophistication of research in forgiveness assessment and offer suggestions to consider when choosing specific instruments to assess dispositional and episodic forgiveness.