Concluding reflections
In this paper, Laura Merla and Loretta Baldassar address some of the key critiques that were formulated in this symposium on the 'care circulation" perspective these two authors offered in their edited volume entitled "Transnational Families, Migration and the Circulation of Care"...
| Autores: | , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2016 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona |
| Repositorio: | Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB |
| Idioma: | inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ddd.uab.cat:148196 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://ddd.uab.cat/record/148196 https://dx.doi.org/urn:doi:10.5565/rev/papers.2268 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Gender Care Social capital Transnational families Social reproduction Body ICT Género Cuidado Capital social Familias transnacionales Reproducción social Cuerpo TIC Gènere Cura Famílies transnacionals Reproducció social Cos |
| Sumario: | In this paper, Laura Merla and Loretta Baldassar address some of the key critiques that were formulated in this symposium on the 'care circulation" perspective these two authors offered in their edited volume entitled "Transnational Families, Migration and the Circulation of Care". Here, they focus in particular on three themes: care as social capital, the need to bring back 'the political', and the (dis)-embodiment of care practices. They highlight in particular that 'care chains' and 'care circulation' should not be seen as opposite, but rather as complementary perspectives. |
|---|