Supplementary Material for: Modelling and operation strategy approaches for on-site Hydrogen Refuelling Stations [Dataset]
S1. Operational strategy flow chart: The operational strategy simplified flow chart of the main filling and refuelling events logic is shown in Figure S.1. Operational strategy simplified flow chart concerning the cascaded filling and refuelling processes of the HRS. Compressor C1 and the battery op...
| Autores: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | conjunto de datos |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2023 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC) |
| Repositorio: | DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:digital.csic.es:10261/334805 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/10261/334805 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Hydrogen refuelling station Operational strategy Modelling approach On-site hydrogen production Green hydrogen production Finite-state machine http://metadata.un.org/sdg/7 http://metadata.un.org/sdg/11 Ensure access to affordable, reliable, sustainable and modern energy for all Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable |
| Sumario: | S1. Operational strategy flow chart: The operational strategy simplified flow chart of the main filling and refuelling events logic is shown in Figure S.1. Operational strategy simplified flow chart concerning the cascaded filling and refuelling processes of the HRS. Compressor C1 and the battery operational strategy is not shown. S2. One-day long simulation supplementary results: This section complementary results for the same simulation configuration of 8 daily HDFVs and 60 kg/day of demand and case c) of Figure 3 of the manuscript. Figure S.2: Compressors flow and power consumption. Simulation configuration: case c) with 60 kg/day and 8 HDFV per day. Results for the first day of January, 2016. Figure S.3: (A) left: direct beam irradiance. (A) right: photovoltaic power generation. (B) left: direct beam irradiance. (C) right: electrolyzer H2 flow rate production. (D) left: power balance of the HRS. (D) right: power balance of the HRS without the battery participation. (D) left: State-of-Charge of the battery. (D) right: power charging/discharging rate applied to the battery. Simulation configuration: case c) with 60 kg/day and 8 HDFV per day. Results for the first day of January, 2016. S3. One-year long simulation results: Figure S.4: H2 tanks pressure dynamic results of case c) with 60 kg/day and 8 HDFV per day. Results for one year of simulation (2016). Figure S.5: (A) left: direct beam irradiance. (A) right: photovoltaic power generation. (B) left: direct beam irradiance. (C) right: electrolyzer H2 flow rate production. (D) left: power balance of the HRS. (D) right: power balance of the HRS without the battery participation. (D) left: State-of-Charge of the battery. (D) right: power charging/discharging rate applied to the battery. Simulation configuration: case c) with 60 kg/day and 8 HDFV per day. Results for one year of simulation (2016). Figure S.6: (A) left: cumulative H2 production emissions in Spain [51]. (A) right: equivalent emissions of the photovoltaic generation in Spain [51]. (B) left: cumulative greenhouse gas emission intensity of H2 production in Spain [51]. (B) right: emission savings according to [51]. Simulation configuration: case c) with 60 kg/day and 8 HDFV per day. Results for one year of simulation (2016). Figure S.7: (A): cumulative HRS operation emissions due to power consumption/injection to the utility grid in Spain [51]. (B) left: cumulative greenhouse gas emission intensity of HRS operation in Spain [51]. (B) right: emission savings according to [51] considering all power loads and the photovoltaic and battery inputs of the model. Simulation configuration: case c) with 60 kg/day and 8 HDFV per day. Results for one year of simulation (2016).-- The ambient temperature is considered constant at 298 K..-- Under a Creative Commons license BY-NC-ND 4.0. |
|---|