Community-driven governance of FAIRness assessment: an open issue, an open discussion

29 Pág.

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Wilkinson, Mark D., Sansone, Susanna Assunta, Méndez, Eva, David, Romain, Dennis, Richard, Hecker, David, Kleemola, Mari, Lacagnina, Carlo, Nikiforova, Anastasija, Castro, Leyla Jael
Tipo de documento: artigo
Estado:Versão publicada
Data de publicação:2023
País:España
Recursos:Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
Repositório:DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
OAI Identifier:oai:digital.csic.es:10261/349657
Acesso em linha:http://hdl.handle.net/10261/349657
https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85174230210
Access Level:Acceso aberto
Palavra-chave:FAIR
FAIR evaluators
FAIRness assessment
Governance
id ES_739641df18adf22e8f4868ae7f2db35d
oai_identifier_str oai:digital.csic.es:10261/349657
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Community-driven governance of FAIRness assessment: an open issue, an open discussion
title Community-driven governance of FAIRness assessment: an open issue, an open discussion
spellingShingle Community-driven governance of FAIRness assessment: an open issue, an open discussion
Wilkinson, Mark D.
FAIR
FAIR evaluators
FAIRness assessment
Governance
title_short Community-driven governance of FAIRness assessment: an open issue, an open discussion
title_full Community-driven governance of FAIRness assessment: an open issue, an open discussion
title_fullStr Community-driven governance of FAIRness assessment: an open issue, an open discussion
title_full_unstemmed Community-driven governance of FAIRness assessment: an open issue, an open discussion
title_sort Community-driven governance of FAIRness assessment: an open issue, an open discussion
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Wilkinson, Mark D.
Sansone, Susanna Assunta
Méndez, Eva
David, Romain
Dennis, Richard
Hecker, David
Kleemola, Mari
Lacagnina, Carlo
Nikiforova, Anastasija
Castro, Leyla Jael
author Wilkinson, Mark D.
author_facet Wilkinson, Mark D.
Sansone, Susanna Assunta
Méndez, Eva
David, Romain
Dennis, Richard
Hecker, David
Kleemola, Mari
Lacagnina, Carlo
Nikiforova, Anastasija
Castro, Leyla Jael
author_role author
author2 Sansone, Susanna Assunta
Méndez, Eva
David, Romain
Dennis, Richard
Hecker, David
Kleemola, Mari
Lacagnina, Carlo
Nikiforova, Anastasija
Castro, Leyla Jael
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv European Commission
Wilkinson, Mark D. [0000-0001-6960-357X]
Sansone, Susanna Assunta [0000-0001-5306-5690]
Méndez, Eva [0000-0002-5337-4722]
David, Romain [0000-0003-4073-7456]
Dennis, Richard [0000-0002-4472-7194]
Hecker, David [0000-0003-3836-2800]
Kleemola, Mari [0000-0001-8855-5075]
Lacagnina, Carlo [0000-0001-9434-9809]
Nikiforova, Anastasija [0000-0002-0532-3488]
Castro, Leyla Jael [0000-0003-3986-0510]
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas [https://ror.org/02gfc7t72]
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv FAIR
FAIR evaluators
FAIRness assessment
Governance
topic FAIR
FAIR evaluators
FAIRness assessment
Governance
description 29 Pág.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023
2024
2024
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
Publisher's version
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10261/349657
https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85174230210
url http://hdl.handle.net/10261/349657
https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85174230210
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv #PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/825575
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/802750
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/824087
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/965406
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/HE/101046203
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/HE/101058020
Departamento de Biotecnología
https://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.15364.2
Sí
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Taylor & Francis
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Taylor & Francis
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
instname:Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
instname_str Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
reponame_str DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
collection DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869410820759224320
spelling Community-driven governance of FAIRness assessment: an open issue, an open discussionWilkinson, Mark D.Sansone, Susanna AssuntaMéndez, EvaDavid, RomainDennis, RichardHecker, DavidKleemola, MariLacagnina, CarloNikiforova, AnastasijaCastro, Leyla JaelFAIRFAIR evaluatorsFAIRness assessmentGovernance29 Pág.Although FAIR Research Data Principles are targeted at and implemented by different communities, research disciplines, and research stakeholders (data stewards, curators, etc.), there is no conclusive way to determine the level of FAIRness intended or required to make research artefacts (including, but not limited to, research data) Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable. The FAIR Principles cover all types of digital objects, metadata, and infrastructures. However, they focus their narrative on data features that support their reusability. FAIR defines principles, not standards, and therefore they do not propose a mechanism to achieve the behaviours they describe in an attempt to be technology/implementation neutral. Various FAIR assessment metrics and tools have been designed to measure FAIRness. Unfortunately, the same digital objects assessed by different tools often exhibit widely different outcomes because of these independent interpretations of FAIR. This results in confusion among the publishers, the funders, and the users of digital research objects. Moreover, in the absence of a standard and transparent definition of what constitutes FAIR behaviours, there is a temptation to define existing approaches as being FAIR-compliant rather than having FAIR define the expected behaviours. This whitepaper identifies three high-level stakeholder categories -FAIR decision and policymakers, FAIR custodians, and FAIR practitioners - and provides examples outlining specific stakeholders' (hypothetical but anticipated) needs. It also examines possible models for governance based on the existing peer efforts, standardisation bodies, and other ways to acknowledge specifications and potential benefits. This whitepaper can serve as a starting point to foster an open discussion around FAIRness governance and the mechanism(s) that could be used to implement it, to be trusted, broadly representative, appropriately scoped, and sustainable. We invite engagement in this conversation in an open Google Group fair-assessment-governance@googlegroups.com.: MDW acknowledges funds supporting his work, including the EJP RD initiative which has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement N°825575. SAS acknowledges funds that supports her, including FAIRplus (IMI 802750), EOSC-Life (H2020 EU 824087), FAIRsharing (Wellcome 212930), Precision Toxicology (H2020 EU 965406), UKRI DASH grant (MR/V038966/1), BY-COVID (Horizon EU 101046203), AgroServ (Horizon EU 10105 8020), and the ELIXIR Interoperability Platform. EM acknowledges support from the FAIRsFAIR Fostering FAIR Data Practices in Europe (funding number 831558). RD David was supported by the EOSC-Life European program under grant agreement Nº824087. LJC acknowledges support from the project NFDI4DataScience, part of the German National Research Data Infrastructure funded by the Joint Science Conference (GWK) and the German Research Foundation (DFG), funding number NFDI 34/1.Peer reviewedTaylor & FrancisEuropean CommissionWilkinson, Mark D. [0000-0001-6960-357X]Sansone, Susanna Assunta [0000-0001-5306-5690]Méndez, Eva [0000-0002-5337-4722]David, Romain [0000-0003-4073-7456]Dennis, Richard [0000-0002-4472-7194]Hecker, David [0000-0003-3836-2800]Kleemola, Mari [0000-0001-8855-5075]Lacagnina, Carlo [0000-0001-9434-9809]Nikiforova, Anastasija [0000-0002-0532-3488]Castro, Leyla Jael [0000-0003-3986-0510]Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas [https://ror.org/02gfc7t72]202420242023info:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Publisher's versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/349657https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/85174230210reponame:DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSICinstname:Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)Inglés#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE##PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE##PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE##PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE##PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE##PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/825575info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/802750info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/824087info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/965406info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/HE/101046203info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/HE/101058020Departamento de Biotecnologíahttps://doi.org/10.12688/openreseurope.15364.2Síinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:digital.csic.es:10261/3496572026-05-22T06:33:51Z
score 15,198674

Registros relacionados