Comparing V-Nova LCEVC SDK with Practical Open-Source Video Codecs
This paper presents a comparative evaluation of the V-Nova LCEVC SDK against several practical open-source video encoders, namely SVT-AV1, XEVE, VVenC, x265, and x264. We analyze the trade-offs between the compression efficiency and encoder/decoder runtime of these encoders for high-resolution (UHD...
| Autores: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2026 |
| País: | España |
| Recursos: | Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche |
| Repositorio: | REDIUMH. Depósito Digital de la UMH |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:dspace.umh.es:11000/39590 |
| Acesso em linha: | https://hdl.handle.net/11000/39590 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palavra-chave: | video coding videos encoding standards transform coding bit rate video codecs video compression software quality assessment CDU::6 - Ciencias aplicadas::62 - Ingeniería. Tecnología CDU::0 - Generalidades.::04 - Ciencia y tecnología de los ordenadores. Informática. CDU::5 - Ciencias puras y naturales::51 - Matemáticas |
| Resumo: | This paper presents a comparative evaluation of the V-Nova LCEVC SDK against several practical open-source video encoders, namely SVT-AV1, XEVE, VVenC, x265, and x264. We analyze the trade-offs between the compression efficiency and encoder/decoder runtime of these encoders for high-resolution (UHD and HD) 10-bit consumer applications under a random access configuration. Rate–distortion behavior is assessed using Video Multimethod Assessment Fusion (VMAF, and VMAF-NEG) and Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio (PSNR), while computational cost is measured through the encoder/decoder runtime. We also analyze the impact of LCEVC’s enhancement layer in terms of both bitrate increase and rate–distortion improvement. The results show that V-Nova LCEVC SDK delivers notable reductions in encoding time with respect to its base codecs, highlighting its suitability as a low-complexity enhancement layer. By comparison, VVenC exhibits a strong compression performance at the expense of high complexity, XEVE also displays considerable encoding times, and SVT-AV1 offers a more balanced compromise between efficiency and computational requirements. |
|---|