DecHPoints: A New Tool for Improving LiDAR Data Filtering in Urban Areas
[EN] Identifying ground points from LiDAR data remains a challenge more than 2 decades after automatic filtering methods were first developed. The efficacy of filtering methods depends on both the physical characteristics of the environment and on the quality of the data used. Other limitations, aff...
| Autores: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2020 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universidad de León |
| Repositorio: | BULERIA. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de León |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:buleria.unileon.es:10612/27604 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s41064-019-00088-7 https://hdl.handle.net/10612/27604 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Cartografía Topografía LiDAR ground identification Decimation and densification tools Hybrid method |
| Sumario: | [EN] Identifying ground points from LiDAR data remains a challenge more than 2 decades after automatic filtering methods were first developed. The efficacy of filtering methods depends on both the physical characteristics of the environment and on the quality of the data used. Other limitations, affecting accessibility and usability, include the choice of filter and identification of optimal parameter values. To address these problems, the most recent filters have increased their level of complexity combining different strategies, so-called hybrid methods. In this study, two tools are proposed to improve the previous filters: a decimation tool for non-ground points and a densification process. Our main improvement is to combine these tools and a filter, in this case the Iterative Robust Interpolation Filter (IRI) (Kraus and Pfeifer in ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 53(4):193–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0924-2716(98)00009-4, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924271698000094, 1998), to (1) improve the filtering results in urban areas by removing buildings prior to filtering, which enables a downsizing of cells used for the selection of ground points and (2) to reduce the influence of parameters on the filtering accuracy. We used two LiDAR data sets: the reference data were acquired from the International Society of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing (ISPRS) and the high density LiDAR data. In the first case, the results obtained are compared with those obtained in previous studies, using the metrics proposed by Sithole and Vosselman (ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 59(1–2):85–101, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2004.05.004, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0924271604000140, 2004). For urban samples, the proposed hybrid method provided better results than the IRI algorithm, yielding a Kappa coefficient of 91.5%. The proposed method is one of the most accurate filters that has been tested with the ISPRS data. Finally, the results obtained on the basis of the high density LiDAR data reinforced the previous results and showed the potential usefulness of the proposed hybrid method. |
|---|