Catchment zoning to enhance co‐benefits and minimize trade‐offs between ecosystem services and freshwater biodiversity conservation

1. Integrating ecosystem services (ESs) in landscape planning can help to identify conservation opportunities by finding co‐benefits between biodiversity conservation and the maintenance of regulating and cultural ecosystem services. The adequate integration of ESs needs careful consideration of pot...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Hermoso, Virgilio, Cattarino, Lorenzo, Linke, Simon, Kennard, Mark J.
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión enviada para evaluación y publicación
Fecha de publicación:2018
País:España
Institución:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)
Repositorio:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
OAI Identifier:oai:recercat.cat:10459.1/68970
Acceso en línea:https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.2891
http://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/68970
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Agriculture suitability
Flood regulation
Freshwater
Management zones
Perennial water
Recreational fisheries
id ES_6ffda07db5dee455819bbb931d6ea996
oai_identifier_str oai:recercat.cat:10459.1/68970
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Catchment zoning to enhance co‐benefits and minimize trade‐offs between ecosystem services and freshwater biodiversity conservationHermoso, VirgilioCattarino, LorenzoLinke, SimonKennard, Mark J.Agriculture suitabilityFlood regulationFreshwaterManagement zonesPerennial waterRecreational fisheries1. Integrating ecosystem services (ESs) in landscape planning can help to identify conservation opportunities by finding co‐benefits between biodiversity conservation and the maintenance of regulating and cultural ecosystem services. The adequate integration of ESs needs careful consideration of potential trade‐offs, however, especially between provisioning services and biodiversity conservation (e.g. the potentially negative consequences of agricultural water extraction within areas important for the maintenance of biodiversity). These trade‐offs have been overlooked in systematic spatial planning to date, especially in freshwater systems. 2. MARXAN WITH ZONES was used to identify priority areas for the conservation of freshwater biodiversity (139 species of freshwater fish, turtles, and waterbirds) and the provision of freshwater ESs in the Daly River, northern Australia. Four different surrogates for ESs were mapped, including those potentially incompatible with conservation goals (i.e. groundwater provision for agriculture and recreational fisheries) and those that are more compatible with conservation (i.e. flood regulation by riparian forests; provision of perennial water). The spatial allocation of multiple management zones was prioritized: (i) three conservation zones, aiming to represent freshwater biodiversity and compatible ESs to enhance co‐benefits; and (ii) two production zones, where access to provisioning ESs could be granted. The representation of ESs obtained when using the multi‐zoning approach was compared with that achieved with a single management zone approach. The comparison was performed across different representation targets. 3. Different results were found with low and high targets for ESs. With low targets (<25% of all ESs), the multi‐zoning approach achieved up to 53% more co‐benefits than the single‐zone approach. With high targets (>25% of all ESs), the trade‐offs avoided were more evident, with up to 56% less representation of incompatible ESs within conservation zones. 4. Multi‐zone planning could help decision makers respond better to the increasingly complex catchment management context, caused by an increasing demand for provisioning services and a diminishing availability of resources, as well as manage and plan for challenges in other realms facing similar problems.Funding support was provided by: the Ramon y Cajal Program, funded by the Spanish Government (RYC‐2013‐13979 to VH); the Australian Research Council (Discovery Grant DP120103353 to SL and MK; DECRA DE130100565 to SL); the Australian Government Department of Environment through the National Environmental Science Program Northern Australia Environmental Resources Hub; and the Australian Rivers Institute, Griffith University.Wiley202020202018info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/submittedVersionhttps://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.2891http://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/68970http://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/68970reponame:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunyainstname:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)InglésVersió preprint del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.2891Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 2018, vol. 28, núm. 4, p. 1004-1014(c) John Wiley & Sons, 2018info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:recercat.cat:10459.1/689702026-05-29T05:05:01Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Catchment zoning to enhance co‐benefits and minimize trade‐offs between ecosystem services and freshwater biodiversity conservation
title Catchment zoning to enhance co‐benefits and minimize trade‐offs between ecosystem services and freshwater biodiversity conservation
spellingShingle Catchment zoning to enhance co‐benefits and minimize trade‐offs between ecosystem services and freshwater biodiversity conservation
Hermoso, Virgilio
Agriculture suitability
Flood regulation
Freshwater
Management zones
Perennial water
Recreational fisheries
title_short Catchment zoning to enhance co‐benefits and minimize trade‐offs between ecosystem services and freshwater biodiversity conservation
title_full Catchment zoning to enhance co‐benefits and minimize trade‐offs between ecosystem services and freshwater biodiversity conservation
title_fullStr Catchment zoning to enhance co‐benefits and minimize trade‐offs between ecosystem services and freshwater biodiversity conservation
title_full_unstemmed Catchment zoning to enhance co‐benefits and minimize trade‐offs between ecosystem services and freshwater biodiversity conservation
title_sort Catchment zoning to enhance co‐benefits and minimize trade‐offs between ecosystem services and freshwater biodiversity conservation
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Hermoso, Virgilio
Cattarino, Lorenzo
Linke, Simon
Kennard, Mark J.
author Hermoso, Virgilio
author_facet Hermoso, Virgilio
Cattarino, Lorenzo
Linke, Simon
Kennard, Mark J.
author_role author
author2 Cattarino, Lorenzo
Linke, Simon
Kennard, Mark J.
author2_role author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Agriculture suitability
Flood regulation
Freshwater
Management zones
Perennial water
Recreational fisheries
topic Agriculture suitability
Flood regulation
Freshwater
Management zones
Perennial water
Recreational fisheries
description 1. Integrating ecosystem services (ESs) in landscape planning can help to identify conservation opportunities by finding co‐benefits between biodiversity conservation and the maintenance of regulating and cultural ecosystem services. The adequate integration of ESs needs careful consideration of potential trade‐offs, however, especially between provisioning services and biodiversity conservation (e.g. the potentially negative consequences of agricultural water extraction within areas important for the maintenance of biodiversity). These trade‐offs have been overlooked in systematic spatial planning to date, especially in freshwater systems. 2. MARXAN WITH ZONES was used to identify priority areas for the conservation of freshwater biodiversity (139 species of freshwater fish, turtles, and waterbirds) and the provision of freshwater ESs in the Daly River, northern Australia. Four different surrogates for ESs were mapped, including those potentially incompatible with conservation goals (i.e. groundwater provision for agriculture and recreational fisheries) and those that are more compatible with conservation (i.e. flood regulation by riparian forests; provision of perennial water). The spatial allocation of multiple management zones was prioritized: (i) three conservation zones, aiming to represent freshwater biodiversity and compatible ESs to enhance co‐benefits; and (ii) two production zones, where access to provisioning ESs could be granted. The representation of ESs obtained when using the multi‐zoning approach was compared with that achieved with a single management zone approach. The comparison was performed across different representation targets. 3. Different results were found with low and high targets for ESs. With low targets (<25% of all ESs), the multi‐zoning approach achieved up to 53% more co‐benefits than the single‐zone approach. With high targets (>25% of all ESs), the trade‐offs avoided were more evident, with up to 56% less representation of incompatible ESs within conservation zones. 4. Multi‐zone planning could help decision makers respond better to the increasingly complex catchment management context, caused by an increasing demand for provisioning services and a diminishing availability of resources, as well as manage and plan for challenges in other realms facing similar problems.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018
2020
2020
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/submittedVersion
format article
status_str submittedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.2891
http://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/68970
http://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/68970
url https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.2891
http://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/68970
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Versió preprint del document publicat a: https://doi.org/10.1002/aqc.2891
Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 2018, vol. 28, núm. 4, p. 1004-1014
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv (c) John Wiley & Sons, 2018
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv (c) John Wiley & Sons, 2018
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
instname:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)
instname_str Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)
reponame_str Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
collection Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869410547798114304
score 15,81155

Similares en LA Referencia