Linking the Community and Metacommunity Perspectives: Biotic Relationships Are Key in Benthic Diatom Ecology
The ecology of benthic diatoms is scarce in diatom reviews, and it seems that the loss of interest in their local ecology (populations–communities) coincides with an increase in metacommunity studies. We include a review of the latter to highlight some unresolved issues. We aim to demonstrate the re...
| Autores: | , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2022 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC) |
| Repositorio: | DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:digital.csic.es:10261/286795 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/10261/286795 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Beta diversity Biotic environment Coexistence–exclusion Dissimilarity Environmental factors Local scale RDA Spatial correlogram Spatial scale Variance partition |
| Sumario: | The ecology of benthic diatoms is scarce in diatom reviews, and it seems that the loss of interest in their local ecology (populations–communities) coincides with an increase in metacommunity studies. We include a review of the latter to highlight some unresolved issues. We aim to demonstrate the relevance of local population–community ecology for a better understanding of the metacommunity by addressing gaps such as the relevance of biotic relationships. We analyzed 132 assemblages of benthic diatoms from two neighboring catchments, with varying altitudes, lentic and lotic waters and substrates. Population–community features (e.g., populations’ relative abundance and alpha diversity) and metacommunity descriptors (e.g., beta diversity indices) were related to likely control factors such as space, catchment features, local physico-chemistry and biotic environment. Our results confirm the relevant role of local interactions between diatoms and with the biotic environment as the mechanism in assembly communities. Moreover, abiotic habitat stability enhances alternative assemblages, which are the base of the metacommunity structure, mostly by taxa sorting and mass effects. Our results suggest that in order to better disclose factors controlling metacommunities, we must study their communities at local scales where mechanisms that explain their assemblage occur, as this is the bridge to a better understanding of benthic diatom ecology. |
|---|