Energy recovery from food waste and garden and park waste: anaerobic co-digestion versus hydrothermal treatment and anaerobic co-digestion
The feasibilities of the anaerobic co-digestion of two of the most relevant biowastes, food waste and garden and park waste, were evaluated and compared with the hydrothermal treatment of each waste and the anaerobic co-digestion of raw biowastes with the process water generated. The effects on the...
| Autores: | , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2022 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universidad Autónoma de Madrid |
| Repositorio: | Biblos-e Archivo. Repositorio Institucional de la UAM |
| Idioma: | inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:repositorio.uam.es:10486/703025 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/10486/703025 https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134223 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Anaerobic co-digestion Biowaste Food waste Garden and park waste Hydrothermal treatment Process water Química |
| Sumario: | The feasibilities of the anaerobic co-digestion of two of the most relevant biowastes, food waste and garden and park waste, were evaluated and compared with the hydrothermal treatment of each waste and the anaerobic co-digestion of raw biowastes with the process water generated. The effects on the process stability and energy recovery were also analyzed. Anaerobic digestion was the best option for food waste treatment from an energetic point of view, with 81% recovery of the energy stored in the feedstock, while the highest energy recovery from garden and park waste was obtained for the solid fraction generated from hydrothermal treatment (85.5%). In addition, the anaerobic co-digestion of food waste with 5% of the process water generated from garden and park waste showed a similar energy recovery to that of food waste only (∼80%), thus improving the biological stability of the process |
|---|