Exploring the analytical consequences of ecological subjectsunwittingly neglected by the mainstream of evolutionary thought

The Darwinian interpretation (Di) of evolutionary process, and its subsequent development in the formof modern evolutionary synthesis (MES), plays a paradigmatic role in the mainstream biological thought.However, the main role in the improvement from Di to MES has depended on population genetics. Co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Rodríguez, Ricardo A., Duncan, Janelle M., Vanni, Michael J., Melkikh, Alexey V., Delgado, Juan Domingo, Riera, Rodrigo, Herrera, Ada M., Camarena, Tomás, Quirós, Ángel, Fernández-Palacios, José María, Miranda, Jezahel V., Perdomo, María E., Fernández-Rodríguez, María J.,, Jiménez-Rodríguez, Antonia, Otto, Rüdiger, Escudero, Carlos G., Navarro-Cerrillo, Rafael M., González, María J.
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2017
País:España
Institución:Universidad de La Laguna (ULL)
Repositorio:RIULL. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de La Laguna
OAI Identifier:oai:riull.ull.es:915/16465
Acceso en línea:http://riull.ull.es/xmlui/handle/915/16465
Access Level:acceso embargado
Palabra clave:Darwinism
Ecosystem ecology
Organic biophysics of ecosystems
Darwinismo
Ecología del ecosistema
Biofísica orgánica de ecosistemas
id ES_6e2d7bf972fc99daeffb8e24033e9352
oai_identifier_str oai:riull.ull.es:915/16465
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Exploring the analytical consequences of ecological subjectsunwittingly neglected by the mainstream of evolutionary thought
title Exploring the analytical consequences of ecological subjectsunwittingly neglected by the mainstream of evolutionary thought
spellingShingle Exploring the analytical consequences of ecological subjectsunwittingly neglected by the mainstream of evolutionary thought
Rodríguez, Ricardo A.
Darwinism
Ecosystem ecology
Organic biophysics of ecosystems
Darwinismo
Ecología del ecosistema
Biofísica orgánica de ecosistemas
title_short Exploring the analytical consequences of ecological subjectsunwittingly neglected by the mainstream of evolutionary thought
title_full Exploring the analytical consequences of ecological subjectsunwittingly neglected by the mainstream of evolutionary thought
title_fullStr Exploring the analytical consequences of ecological subjectsunwittingly neglected by the mainstream of evolutionary thought
title_full_unstemmed Exploring the analytical consequences of ecological subjectsunwittingly neglected by the mainstream of evolutionary thought
title_sort Exploring the analytical consequences of ecological subjectsunwittingly neglected by the mainstream of evolutionary thought
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Rodríguez, Ricardo A.
Duncan, Janelle M.
Vanni, Michael J.
Melkikh, Alexey V.
Delgado, Juan Domingo
Riera, Rodrigo
Herrera, Ada M.
Camarena, Tomás
Quirós, Ángel
Fernández-Palacios, José María
Miranda, Jezahel V.
Perdomo, María E.
Fernández-Rodríguez, María J.,
Jiménez-Rodríguez, Antonia
Otto, Rüdiger
Escudero, Carlos G.
Navarro-Cerrillo, Rafael M.
González, María J.
author Rodríguez, Ricardo A.
author_facet Rodríguez, Ricardo A.
Duncan, Janelle M.
Vanni, Michael J.
Melkikh, Alexey V.
Delgado, Juan Domingo
Riera, Rodrigo
Herrera, Ada M.
Camarena, Tomás
Quirós, Ángel
Fernández-Palacios, José María
Miranda, Jezahel V.
Perdomo, María E.
Fernández-Rodríguez, María J.,
Jiménez-Rodríguez, Antonia
Otto, Rüdiger
Escudero, Carlos G.
Navarro-Cerrillo, Rafael M.
González, María J.
author_role author
author2 Duncan, Janelle M.
Vanni, Michael J.
Melkikh, Alexey V.
Delgado, Juan Domingo
Riera, Rodrigo
Herrera, Ada M.
Camarena, Tomás
Quirós, Ángel
Fernández-Palacios, José María
Miranda, Jezahel V.
Perdomo, María E.
Fernández-Rodríguez, María J.,
Jiménez-Rodríguez, Antonia
Otto, Rüdiger
Escudero, Carlos G.
Navarro-Cerrillo, Rafael M.
González, María J.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Darwinism
Ecosystem ecology
Organic biophysics of ecosystems
Darwinismo
Ecología del ecosistema
Biofísica orgánica de ecosistemas
topic Darwinism
Ecosystem ecology
Organic biophysics of ecosystems
Darwinismo
Ecología del ecosistema
Biofísica orgánica de ecosistemas
description The Darwinian interpretation (Di) of evolutionary process, and its subsequent development in the formof modern evolutionary synthesis (MES), plays a paradigmatic role in the mainstream biological thought.However, the main role in the improvement from Di to MES has depended on population genetics. Con-ventional ecosystem ecology has added relatively few specific insights to this endeavor in spite of thewell-known combined selective influence from environment. This article integrates i) recent findings ingenetics (i.e.: evolutionary capacitance); ii) orthodox topics as well as recent results from a large set ofmodels in ecosystem ecology which have recently been encompassed under the term “organic biophysicsof ecosystem”; and iii) an epistemological analysis of the origin of On the Origin of Species. . . by reachingfour main particular conclusions: (a) Despite the contemporary recognition that any kind of interspecificrelationship has an evolutionary influence, the analytical emphasis of Di and MES on competition hasbeen unwittingly oversized because of the paradoxical manner in which mutualism can emerge as anessential evolutionary force starting from competition, being this an unpublished topic that is analyzedin this manuscript by the first time. This link between two interspecific relationships that seem oppositeto each other at the first glance is based on quantum effects that are totally unknown in conventionalevolutionary theory due to its bias in favor of genetics, neglecting ecological considerations by contrast.(b) A holistic combination of ecological, genetic and evolutionary insights at the ecosystem level addi-tionally confirms that the analytical role of evolutionary gradualism has also been oversized. (c) Themain criterion of evolutionary success conventionally applied by Di and MES should be modified giventhat: (d) the preferential direction of evolutionary process theoretically proposed by Di and MES doesnot match with the direction of spontaneous development of natural ecosystems. The final section ofthis manuscript explains that these four critical outcomes in regard to Di and MES seem to have theirroot in epistemological inaccuracies involved in the origin of On the Origin of Species. . .that have beenpassed from generation to generation without being subjected to interdisciplinary scrutiny. This arti-cle showcases the need to review some of the foundational principles of Di and MES before building a“new floor” (i.e.: the extended evolutionary synthesis) supported on our current perspective about theevolutionary process. So, contrastingly with the genocentric nature of conventional evolutionary theory, large sections of our current evolutionary thought could change if we take into account some old results,as well as some recent ones, achieved by means of interdisciplinary approaches. In summary, this arti-cle concludes that the MES, despite its correct structure in essential points, could reach a significantlymore complete epistemological condition than its current state if we add some fundamental results fromecosystem ecology that have been unwittingly neglected so far.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017
2019
2019
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://riull.ull.es/xmlui/handle/915/16465
url http://riull.ull.es/xmlui/handle/915/16465
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Ecological Modelling;355, 2017
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacional
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv embargoedAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:RIULL. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de La Laguna
instname:Universidad de La Laguna (ULL)
instname_str Universidad de La Laguna (ULL)
reponame_str RIULL. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de La Laguna
collection RIULL. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de La Laguna
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869410405923684352
spelling Exploring the analytical consequences of ecological subjectsunwittingly neglected by the mainstream of evolutionary thoughtRodríguez, Ricardo A.Duncan, Janelle M.Vanni, Michael J.Melkikh, Alexey V.Delgado, Juan DomingoRiera, RodrigoHerrera, Ada M.Camarena, TomásQuirós, ÁngelFernández-Palacios, José MaríaMiranda, Jezahel V.Perdomo, María E.Fernández-Rodríguez, María J.,Jiménez-Rodríguez, AntoniaOtto, RüdigerEscudero, Carlos G.Navarro-Cerrillo, Rafael M.González, María J.DarwinismEcosystem ecologyOrganic biophysics of ecosystemsDarwinismoEcología del ecosistemaBiofísica orgánica de ecosistemasThe Darwinian interpretation (Di) of evolutionary process, and its subsequent development in the formof modern evolutionary synthesis (MES), plays a paradigmatic role in the mainstream biological thought.However, the main role in the improvement from Di to MES has depended on population genetics. Con-ventional ecosystem ecology has added relatively few specific insights to this endeavor in spite of thewell-known combined selective influence from environment. This article integrates i) recent findings ingenetics (i.e.: evolutionary capacitance); ii) orthodox topics as well as recent results from a large set ofmodels in ecosystem ecology which have recently been encompassed under the term “organic biophysicsof ecosystem”; and iii) an epistemological analysis of the origin of On the Origin of Species. . . by reachingfour main particular conclusions: (a) Despite the contemporary recognition that any kind of interspecificrelationship has an evolutionary influence, the analytical emphasis of Di and MES on competition hasbeen unwittingly oversized because of the paradoxical manner in which mutualism can emerge as anessential evolutionary force starting from competition, being this an unpublished topic that is analyzedin this manuscript by the first time. This link between two interspecific relationships that seem oppositeto each other at the first glance is based on quantum effects that are totally unknown in conventionalevolutionary theory due to its bias in favor of genetics, neglecting ecological considerations by contrast.(b) A holistic combination of ecological, genetic and evolutionary insights at the ecosystem level addi-tionally confirms that the analytical role of evolutionary gradualism has also been oversized. (c) Themain criterion of evolutionary success conventionally applied by Di and MES should be modified giventhat: (d) the preferential direction of evolutionary process theoretically proposed by Di and MES doesnot match with the direction of spontaneous development of natural ecosystems. The final section ofthis manuscript explains that these four critical outcomes in regard to Di and MES seem to have theirroot in epistemological inaccuracies involved in the origin of On the Origin of Species. . .that have beenpassed from generation to generation without being subjected to interdisciplinary scrutiny. This arti-cle showcases the need to review some of the foundational principles of Di and MES before building a“new floor” (i.e.: the extended evolutionary synthesis) supported on our current perspective about theevolutionary process. So, contrastingly with the genocentric nature of conventional evolutionary theory, large sections of our current evolutionary thought could change if we take into account some old results,as well as some recent ones, achieved by means of interdisciplinary approaches. In summary, this arti-cle concludes that the MES, despite its correct structure in essential points, could reach a significantlymore complete epistemological condition than its current state if we add some fundamental results fromecosystem ecology that have been unwittingly neglected so far.Elsevier201920192017info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://riull.ull.es/xmlui/handle/915/16465reponame:RIULL. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de La Lagunainstname:Universidad de La Laguna (ULL)InglésEcological Modelling;355, 2017Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internacionalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/embargoedAccessoai:riull.ull.es:915/164652026-06-22T13:13:57Z
score 15.300719