Validity of a method for the self-screening of cardiovascular risk

BACKGROUND: The validity of a cardiovascular risk self-screening method was assessed. The results obtained for self-measurement of blood pressure, a point-of-care system's assessment of lipid profile and glycated hemoglobin, and a self-administered questionnaire (sex, age, diabetes, tobacco...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Barroso, María, Pérez-Fernández, Silvia, Vila, M. Mar, Zomeño Fajardo, María Dolores, Martí-Lluch, Ruth, Cordón, Ferran, Ramos, Rafel, Elosua Llanos, Roberto, Dégano, Irene R., Fitó Colomer, Montserrat, Cabezas, Carmen, Salvador, Gemma, Castell, Conxa, Grau Magaña, Maria
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2018
País:España
Institución:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)
Repositorio:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
OAI Identifier:oai:recercat.cat:10230/36979
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/10230/36979
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S158358
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Cor -- Malalties -- Epidemiologia
Cardiovascular diseases
Empowerment
Epidemiology
Preventive medicine
Public health
Risk assessment
id ES_6df4f5dfd671cefbf6078a42e60e2a4b
oai_identifier_str oai:recercat.cat:10230/36979
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Validity of a method for the self-screening of cardiovascular riskBarroso, MaríaPérez-Fernández, SilviaVila, M. MarZomeño Fajardo, María DoloresMartí-Lluch, RuthCordón, FerranRamos, RafelElosua Llanos, RobertoDégano, Irene R.Fitó Colomer, MontserratCabezas, CarmenSalvador, GemmaCastell, ConxaGrau Magaña, MariaCor -- Malalties -- EpidemiologiaCardiovascular diseasesEmpowermentEpidemiologyPreventive medicinePublic healthRisk assessmentBACKGROUND: The validity of a cardiovascular risk self-screening method was assessed. The results obtained for self-measurement of blood pressure, a point-of-care system's assessment of lipid profile and glycated hemoglobin, and a self-administered questionnaire (sex, age, diabetes, tobacco consumption) were compared with the standard screening (gold standard) conducted by a health professional. METHODS: Crossover clinical trial on a population-based sample from Girona (north-eastern Spain), aged 35-74, with no cardiovascular disease at recruitment. Participants were randomized to one of the two risk assessment sequences (standard screening followed by self-screening or vice versa). Cardiovascular risk was estimated with the Framingham-REGICOR function. Concordance between methods was estimated with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were estimated, considering 5% cardiovascular risk as the cutoff point. ClinicalTrials.gov Registration #NCT02373319. Clinical Research Ethic Committee of the Parc de Salut Mar Registration #2014/5815/I. RESULTS: The median cardiovascular risk in men was 2.56 (interquartile range: 1.42-4.35) estimated by standard methods and 2.25 (1.28-4.07) by self-screening with ICC=0.92 (95% CI: 0.90-0.93). In women, the cardiovascular risk was 1.14 (0.61-2.10) by standard methods and 1.10 (0.56-2.00) by self-screening, with ICC=0.89 (0.87-0.90). The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for the self-screening method were 0.74 (0.63-0.82), 0.97 (0.95-0.99), 0.86 (0.77-0.93), and 0.94 (0.91-0.96), respectively, in men. In women, these values were 0.50 (0.30-0.70), 0.99 (0.98-1), 0.81 (0.54-0.96), and 0.97 (0.95-0.99), respectively. CONCLUSION: The self-screening method for assessing cardiovascular risk provided similar results to the standard method. Self-screening had high clinical performance to rule out intermediate or high cardiovascular risk.Dove Medical Press201920192018info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10230/36979http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S158358reponame:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunyainstname:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)InglésClinical Epidemiology. 2018 May 10;10:549-60© 2018 Barroso et al. This work is published and licensed by Dove Medical Press Limited. The full terms of this license are available at https://www.dovepress.com/terms. php and incorporate the Creative Commons Attribution – Non Commercial (unported, v3.0) License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/). By accessing the work you hereby accept the Terms. Non-commercial uses of the work are permitted without any further permission from Dove Medical Press Limited, provided the work is properly attributed. For permission for commercial use of this work, please see paragraphs 4.2 and 5 of our Terms (https://www.dovepress.com/terms.php).http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:recercat.cat:10230/369792026-05-29T05:05:01Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Validity of a method for the self-screening of cardiovascular risk
title Validity of a method for the self-screening of cardiovascular risk
spellingShingle Validity of a method for the self-screening of cardiovascular risk
Barroso, María
Cor -- Malalties -- Epidemiologia
Cardiovascular diseases
Empowerment
Epidemiology
Preventive medicine
Public health
Risk assessment
title_short Validity of a method for the self-screening of cardiovascular risk
title_full Validity of a method for the self-screening of cardiovascular risk
title_fullStr Validity of a method for the self-screening of cardiovascular risk
title_full_unstemmed Validity of a method for the self-screening of cardiovascular risk
title_sort Validity of a method for the self-screening of cardiovascular risk
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Barroso, María
Pérez-Fernández, Silvia
Vila, M. Mar
Zomeño Fajardo, María Dolores
Martí-Lluch, Ruth
Cordón, Ferran
Ramos, Rafel
Elosua Llanos, Roberto
Dégano, Irene R.
Fitó Colomer, Montserrat
Cabezas, Carmen
Salvador, Gemma
Castell, Conxa
Grau Magaña, Maria
author Barroso, María
author_facet Barroso, María
Pérez-Fernández, Silvia
Vila, M. Mar
Zomeño Fajardo, María Dolores
Martí-Lluch, Ruth
Cordón, Ferran
Ramos, Rafel
Elosua Llanos, Roberto
Dégano, Irene R.
Fitó Colomer, Montserrat
Cabezas, Carmen
Salvador, Gemma
Castell, Conxa
Grau Magaña, Maria
author_role author
author2 Pérez-Fernández, Silvia
Vila, M. Mar
Zomeño Fajardo, María Dolores
Martí-Lluch, Ruth
Cordón, Ferran
Ramos, Rafel
Elosua Llanos, Roberto
Dégano, Irene R.
Fitó Colomer, Montserrat
Cabezas, Carmen
Salvador, Gemma
Castell, Conxa
Grau Magaña, Maria
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Cor -- Malalties -- Epidemiologia
Cardiovascular diseases
Empowerment
Epidemiology
Preventive medicine
Public health
Risk assessment
topic Cor -- Malalties -- Epidemiologia
Cardiovascular diseases
Empowerment
Epidemiology
Preventive medicine
Public health
Risk assessment
description BACKGROUND: The validity of a cardiovascular risk self-screening method was assessed. The results obtained for self-measurement of blood pressure, a point-of-care system's assessment of lipid profile and glycated hemoglobin, and a self-administered questionnaire (sex, age, diabetes, tobacco consumption) were compared with the standard screening (gold standard) conducted by a health professional. METHODS: Crossover clinical trial on a population-based sample from Girona (north-eastern Spain), aged 35-74, with no cardiovascular disease at recruitment. Participants were randomized to one of the two risk assessment sequences (standard screening followed by self-screening or vice versa). Cardiovascular risk was estimated with the Framingham-REGICOR function. Concordance between methods was estimated with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were estimated, considering 5% cardiovascular risk as the cutoff point. ClinicalTrials.gov Registration #NCT02373319. Clinical Research Ethic Committee of the Parc de Salut Mar Registration #2014/5815/I. RESULTS: The median cardiovascular risk in men was 2.56 (interquartile range: 1.42-4.35) estimated by standard methods and 2.25 (1.28-4.07) by self-screening with ICC=0.92 (95% CI: 0.90-0.93). In women, the cardiovascular risk was 1.14 (0.61-2.10) by standard methods and 1.10 (0.56-2.00) by self-screening, with ICC=0.89 (0.87-0.90). The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values for the self-screening method were 0.74 (0.63-0.82), 0.97 (0.95-0.99), 0.86 (0.77-0.93), and 0.94 (0.91-0.96), respectively, in men. In women, these values were 0.50 (0.30-0.70), 0.99 (0.98-1), 0.81 (0.54-0.96), and 0.97 (0.95-0.99), respectively. CONCLUSION: The self-screening method for assessing cardiovascular risk provided similar results to the standard method. Self-screening had high clinical performance to rule out intermediate or high cardiovascular risk.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018
2019
2019
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10230/36979
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S158358
url http://hdl.handle.net/10230/36979
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S158358
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Clinical Epidemiology. 2018 May 10;10:549-60
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Dove Medical Press
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Dove Medical Press
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
instname:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)
instname_str Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)
reponame_str Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
collection Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869410390509617152
score 15,811543