Evolutionary feature selection to estimate forest stand variablesusing LiDAR
Light detection and ranging (LiDAR) has become an important tool in forestry. LiDAR-derived models are mostly developed by means of multiple linear regression (MLR) after stepwise selection of predictors. An increasing interest in machine learning and evolutionary computation has recently arisen to...
| Autores: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión aceptada para publicación |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2014 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universidad de Sevilla (US) |
| Repositorio: | idUS. Depósito de Investigación de la Universidad de Sevilla |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:idus.us.es:11441/43570 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/11441/43570 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2013.06.005 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Evolutionary computation Forest-stand variables LiDAR regression Stepwise selection |
| id |
ES_6d2f5c6dec99183e58df6edf96033b2b |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:idus.us.es:11441/43570 |
| network_acronym_str |
ES |
| network_name_str |
España |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
Evolutionary feature selection to estimate forest stand variablesusing LiDARGarcía Gutiérrez, JorgeGonzález Ferreiro, EduardoRiquelme Santos, José CristóbalMiranda, DavidDiéguez Aranda, UlisesNavarro Cerrillo, Rafael M.Evolutionary computationForest-stand variablesLiDARregressionStepwise selectionLight detection and ranging (LiDAR) has become an important tool in forestry. LiDAR-derived models are mostly developed by means of multiple linear regression (MLR) after stepwise selection of predictors. An increasing interest in machine learning and evolutionary computation has recently arisen to improve regression use in LiDAR data processing. Although evolutionary machine learning has already proven to be suitable for regression, evolutionary computation may also be applied to improve parametric models such as MLR. This paper provides a hybrid approach based on joint use of MLR and a novel genetic algorithm for the estimation of the main forest stand variables. We show a comparison between our genetic approach and other common methods of selecting predictors. The results obtained from several LiDAR datasets with different pulse densities in two areas of the Iberian Peninsula indicate that genetic algorithms perform better than the other methods statistically. Preliminary studies suggest that a lack of parametric conditions in field data and possible misuse of parametric tests may be the main reasons for the better performance of the genetic algorithm. This research confirms the findings of previous studies that outline the importance of evolutionary computation in the context of LiDAR analisys of forest data, especially when the size of fieldwork datatasets is reduced.Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología TIN2007- 68084-C-00Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología TIN2011-28956-C02Xunta de Galicia 09MRU022291PXunta de Galicia CGL2011-30285-C02-02Xunta de Galicia FP7-SME-2011-BSGElsevierLenguajes y Sistemas Informáticos2014info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/11441/43570https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2013.06.005reponame:idUS. Depósito de Investigación de la Universidad de Sevillainstname:Universidad de Sevilla (US)InglésInternational Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 26, 119-131.TIN2007- 68084-C-00TIN2011-28956-C0209MRU022291PCGL2011-30285-C02-02FP7-SME-2011-BSGhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2013.06.005info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:idus.us.es:11441/435702026-06-17T12:51:07Z |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Evolutionary feature selection to estimate forest stand variablesusing LiDAR |
| title |
Evolutionary feature selection to estimate forest stand variablesusing LiDAR |
| spellingShingle |
Evolutionary feature selection to estimate forest stand variablesusing LiDAR García Gutiérrez, Jorge Evolutionary computation Forest-stand variables LiDAR regression Stepwise selection |
| title_short |
Evolutionary feature selection to estimate forest stand variablesusing LiDAR |
| title_full |
Evolutionary feature selection to estimate forest stand variablesusing LiDAR |
| title_fullStr |
Evolutionary feature selection to estimate forest stand variablesusing LiDAR |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Evolutionary feature selection to estimate forest stand variablesusing LiDAR |
| title_sort |
Evolutionary feature selection to estimate forest stand variablesusing LiDAR |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
García Gutiérrez, Jorge González Ferreiro, Eduardo Riquelme Santos, José Cristóbal Miranda, David Diéguez Aranda, Ulises Navarro Cerrillo, Rafael M. |
| author |
García Gutiérrez, Jorge |
| author_facet |
García Gutiérrez, Jorge González Ferreiro, Eduardo Riquelme Santos, José Cristóbal Miranda, David Diéguez Aranda, Ulises Navarro Cerrillo, Rafael M. |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
González Ferreiro, Eduardo Riquelme Santos, José Cristóbal Miranda, David Diéguez Aranda, Ulises Navarro Cerrillo, Rafael M. |
| author2_role |
author author author author author |
| dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Lenguajes y Sistemas Informáticos |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Evolutionary computation Forest-stand variables LiDAR regression Stepwise selection |
| topic |
Evolutionary computation Forest-stand variables LiDAR regression Stepwise selection |
| description |
Light detection and ranging (LiDAR) has become an important tool in forestry. LiDAR-derived models are mostly developed by means of multiple linear regression (MLR) after stepwise selection of predictors. An increasing interest in machine learning and evolutionary computation has recently arisen to improve regression use in LiDAR data processing. Although evolutionary machine learning has already proven to be suitable for regression, evolutionary computation may also be applied to improve parametric models such as MLR. This paper provides a hybrid approach based on joint use of MLR and a novel genetic algorithm for the estimation of the main forest stand variables. We show a comparison between our genetic approach and other common methods of selecting predictors. The results obtained from several LiDAR datasets with different pulse densities in two areas of the Iberian Peninsula indicate that genetic algorithms perform better than the other methods statistically. Preliminary studies suggest that a lack of parametric conditions in field data and possible misuse of parametric tests may be the main reasons for the better performance of the genetic algorithm. This research confirms the findings of previous studies that outline the importance of evolutionary computation in the context of LiDAR analisys of forest data, especially when the size of fieldwork datatasets is reduced. |
| publishDate |
2014 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2014 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/acceptedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
acceptedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/11441/43570 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2013.06.005 |
| url |
http://hdl.handle.net/11441/43570 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2013.06.005 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
Inglés |
| language_invalid_str_mv |
Inglés |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 26, 119-131. TIN2007- 68084-C-00 TIN2011-28956-C02 09MRU022291P CGL2011-30285-C02-02 FP7-SME-2011-BSG http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2013.06.005 |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Elsevier |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:idUS. Depósito de Investigación de la Universidad de Sevilla instname:Universidad de Sevilla (US) |
| instname_str |
Universidad de Sevilla (US) |
| reponame_str |
idUS. Depósito de Investigación de la Universidad de Sevilla |
| collection |
idUS. Depósito de Investigación de la Universidad de Sevilla |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1869410333576134656 |
| score |
15.301603 |