Biofilm formation in Streptococcus suis: in vitro impact of serovars and assessment of coinfections with other porcine respiratory disease complex bacterial pathogens

[EN] Streptococcus suis is a worldwide pathogen that impacts the swine industry, causing severe clinical signs, including meningitis and arthritis, in postweaning piglets. A key virulence mechanism of S. suis is biofilm formation, which improves its persistence and resistance to external factors. He...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Miguélez Pérez, Rubén, Mencía Ares, Óscar, Gutiérrez Martín, César Bernardo, González Fernández, Alba, Rilo, Máximo Petrocchi, Delgado García, Mario, Martínez Martínez, Sonia
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2024
País:España
Institución:Universidad de León
Repositorio:BULERIA. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad de León
OAI Identifier:oai:buleria.unileon.es:10612/23551
Acceso en línea:https://veterinaryresearch.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13567-024-01412-9
https://hdl.handle.net/10612/23551
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Sanidad animal
Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae
Glaesserella parasuis
Pasteurella multocida
Pig
Respiratory pathogens
Serotype
Staphylococcus hyicus
Swine
Virulence factor
3109 Ciencias Veterinarias
Descripción
Sumario:[EN] Streptococcus suis is a worldwide pathogen that impacts the swine industry, causing severe clinical signs, including meningitis and arthritis, in postweaning piglets. A key virulence mechanism of S. suis is biofilm formation, which improves its persistence and resistance to external factors. Here, we assessed the in vitro biofilm formation of 240 S. suis isolates from Spanish swine farms and evaluated the effects of serovars (SVs) and coinfections with other porcine respiratory disease complex (PRDC) pathogens. Our study revealed significant heterogeneity in biofilm formation among S. suis SVs. Notably, SV2 resulted in the lowest degree of biofilm formation, in contrast with the high biofilm-forming capacities of SV1, SV7, and SV9. Other PRDC pathogens, including Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae, Glaesserella parasuis, and Pasteurella multocida, formed biofilms, although they were generally less robust than those of S. suis (except for SV2), which contrasts with the high biofilm formation of Staphylococcus hyicus. Coinfections enhanced biofilm formation in mixed cultures of S. suis, particularly with P. multocida. Other coinfections revealed variable results in pathogen interactions, suggesting the potential of biofilms for increased persistence and pathogenicity in coinfections. In conclusion, this study underscores the importance of serovar-specific differences in biofilm formation among S. suis isolates, with significant implications for pathogenicity and persistence. The heterogeneous biofilm formation observed in coinfections with other PRDC pathogens reveals a complex interplay that could exacerbate disease severity. These findings provide a foundation for further research on biofilm mechanisms to mitigate the impact of PRDC in the swine industry