A systematic review of capability and maturity innovation assessment models: Opportunities and challenges

Public funding, being the primary source for innovation, imposes restrictions caused by a lack of trust between the roles of public funders and organisations in the innovation process. Capability and maturity innovation assessment models can improve the process by combining both roles to create an a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Giménez Medina, Manuel, González Enríquez, José, Domínguez Mayo, Francisco José
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión enviada para evaluación y publicación
Fecha de publicación:2023
País:España
Institución:Universidad de Sevilla (US)
Repositorio:idUS. Depósito de Investigación de la Universidad de Sevilla
OAI Identifier:oai:idus.us.es:11441/139391
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/11441/139391
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118968
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Innovation assessment
Innovation management
Technological innovation
Capability maturity model
Innovation management systems
Systematic mapping study
id ES_6d032ec57461e0499e25f9ff0868ff6d
oai_identifier_str oai:idus.us.es:11441/139391
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling A systematic review of capability and maturity innovation assessment models: Opportunities and challengesGiménez Medina, ManuelGonzález Enríquez, JoséDomínguez Mayo, Francisco JoséInnovation assessmentInnovation managementTechnological innovationCapability maturity modelInnovation management systemsSystematic mapping studyPublic funding, being the primary source for innovation, imposes restrictions caused by a lack of trust between the roles of public funders and organisations in the innovation process. Capability and maturity innovation assessment models can improve the process by combining both roles to create an agile and trusting environment. This paper aims to provide a current description of the state-of-the-art on capability and maturity innovation assessment models in the context of Information and Communication Technologies. To this end, a Systematic Mapping Study was carried out considering high quality published research from four relevant digital libraries since 2000. The 78 primary studies analysed show several gaps and challenges. In particular, a common ontology has not been achieved, and Innovation Management Systems are scarcely considered. Concepts such as open innovation have not been correctly applied to incorporate all Quadruple Helix stakeholders, especially the government and its role as a public funder. This implies that no studies explore a standard agile public–private maturity model based on capabilities since the public funders’ restrictions have not been considered. Furthermore, although some concepts of innovation capabilities have evolved, none of the studies analysed offer a comprehensive coverage of capabilities. As potential future lines of research, this paper proposes 11 challenges based on the 5 shortcomings found in the literature.Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación PID2019-105455GB-C31Premio Mensual Publicación Científica Destacada de la US. Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería InformáticaElsevierLenguajes y Sistemas InformáticosTIC-021: Engineering and Science for Software SystemsTIC-134: Sistemas InformáticosMinisterio de Ciencia e Innovación (MICIN). España2023info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/submittedVersionapplication/pdfapplication/pdfhttps://hdl.handle.net/11441/139391https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118968reponame:idUS. Depósito de Investigación de la Universidad de Sevillainstname:Universidad de Sevilla (US)InglésExpert Systems with Applications, 213, Part B (art. nº118968).PID2019-105455GB-C31https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957417422019868?via%3Dihubinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:idus.us.es:11441/1393912026-06-17T12:51:07Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A systematic review of capability and maturity innovation assessment models: Opportunities and challenges
title A systematic review of capability and maturity innovation assessment models: Opportunities and challenges
spellingShingle A systematic review of capability and maturity innovation assessment models: Opportunities and challenges
Giménez Medina, Manuel
Innovation assessment
Innovation management
Technological innovation
Capability maturity model
Innovation management systems
Systematic mapping study
title_short A systematic review of capability and maturity innovation assessment models: Opportunities and challenges
title_full A systematic review of capability and maturity innovation assessment models: Opportunities and challenges
title_fullStr A systematic review of capability and maturity innovation assessment models: Opportunities and challenges
title_full_unstemmed A systematic review of capability and maturity innovation assessment models: Opportunities and challenges
title_sort A systematic review of capability and maturity innovation assessment models: Opportunities and challenges
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Giménez Medina, Manuel
González Enríquez, José
Domínguez Mayo, Francisco José
author Giménez Medina, Manuel
author_facet Giménez Medina, Manuel
González Enríquez, José
Domínguez Mayo, Francisco José
author_role author
author2 González Enríquez, José
Domínguez Mayo, Francisco José
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Lenguajes y Sistemas Informáticos
TIC-021: Engineering and Science for Software Systems
TIC-134: Sistemas Informáticos
Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación (MICIN). España
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Innovation assessment
Innovation management
Technological innovation
Capability maturity model
Innovation management systems
Systematic mapping study
topic Innovation assessment
Innovation management
Technological innovation
Capability maturity model
Innovation management systems
Systematic mapping study
description Public funding, being the primary source for innovation, imposes restrictions caused by a lack of trust between the roles of public funders and organisations in the innovation process. Capability and maturity innovation assessment models can improve the process by combining both roles to create an agile and trusting environment. This paper aims to provide a current description of the state-of-the-art on capability and maturity innovation assessment models in the context of Information and Communication Technologies. To this end, a Systematic Mapping Study was carried out considering high quality published research from four relevant digital libraries since 2000. The 78 primary studies analysed show several gaps and challenges. In particular, a common ontology has not been achieved, and Innovation Management Systems are scarcely considered. Concepts such as open innovation have not been correctly applied to incorporate all Quadruple Helix stakeholders, especially the government and its role as a public funder. This implies that no studies explore a standard agile public–private maturity model based on capabilities since the public funders’ restrictions have not been considered. Furthermore, although some concepts of innovation capabilities have evolved, none of the studies analysed offer a comprehensive coverage of capabilities. As potential future lines of research, this paper proposes 11 challenges based on the 5 shortcomings found in the literature.
publishDate 2023
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2023
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/submittedVersion
format article
status_str submittedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://hdl.handle.net/11441/139391
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118968
url https://hdl.handle.net/11441/139391
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118968
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Expert Systems with Applications, 213, Part B (art. nº118968).
PID2019-105455GB-C31
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0957417422019868?via%3Dihub
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:idUS. Depósito de Investigación de la Universidad de Sevilla
instname:Universidad de Sevilla (US)
instname_str Universidad de Sevilla (US)
reponame_str idUS. Depósito de Investigación de la Universidad de Sevilla
collection idUS. Depósito de Investigación de la Universidad de Sevilla
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869410309519704064
score 15,300724

Similares en LA Referencia