Using online peer feedback tools to improve undergraduate group interaction and assessment quality

[EN] In higher education, sophisticated online learning management systems offer educators unprecedented opportunity to design and implement assessment-specific feedback rubrics with relative ease. In 2022, Feedback Fruits, a flexible, online feedback tool, became available at Flinders University (A...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Emery, Kirsty, Shephard, Mark, Matthews, Susan
Tipo de recurso: capítulo de libro
Fecha de publicación:2024
País:España
Institución:Universitat Politècnica de València (UPV)
Repositorio:RiuNet. Repositorio Institucional de la Universitat Politécnica de Valéncia
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:riunet.upv.es:10251/206685
Acceso en línea:https://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/206685
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Feedback
Peer
Feedback Fruits
Assessment
Quality
id ES_6bb46abfeb50db4b70a2cf4f9641e088
oai_identifier_str oai:riunet.upv.es:10251/206685
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Using online peer feedback tools to improve undergraduate group interaction and assessment qualityEmery, KirstyShephard, MarkMatthews, SusanFeedbackPeerFeedback FruitsAssessmentQuality[EN] In higher education, sophisticated online learning management systems offer educators unprecedented opportunity to design and implement assessment-specific feedback rubrics with relative ease. In 2022, Feedback Fruits, a flexible, online feedback tool, became available at Flinders University (Australia) with system migration to Canvas. This study evaluated the acceptability and impact of online peer feedback rubrics introduced to a group assessment in a 3rd year, undergraduate, medical science topic. In this study, online feedback participation rates were high (range 84.3-96%), with participants preference for anonymous feedback (77%). Mean peer evaluation scores improved for information sharing, task completion and discussion at final assessment; with feedback received ranked ‘high’ by 56.8% of students. Mean group evaluation scores improved for topic coverage, poster format and referencing at final assessment; with feedback received ranked ‘high’ by 59.1% of. students. In summary, online peer feedback improved student engagement and group assessment learning in this topic.Editorial Universitat Politècnica de ValènciaRepositorio Institucional de la Universitat Politècnica de València Riunet20242024-06-24book parthttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_3248VoRhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85info:eu-repo/semantics/bookPartapplication/pdfhttps://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/206685reponame:RiuNet. Repositorio Institucional de la Universitat Politécnica de Valénciainstname:Universitat Politècnica de València (UPV)Inglésengopen accesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2Reconocimiento - No comercial - Compartir igual (by-nc-sa) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:riunet.upv.es:10251/2066852026-06-13T07:49:27Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Using online peer feedback tools to improve undergraduate group interaction and assessment quality
title Using online peer feedback tools to improve undergraduate group interaction and assessment quality
spellingShingle Using online peer feedback tools to improve undergraduate group interaction and assessment quality
Emery, Kirsty
Feedback
Peer
Feedback Fruits
Assessment
Quality
title_short Using online peer feedback tools to improve undergraduate group interaction and assessment quality
title_full Using online peer feedback tools to improve undergraduate group interaction and assessment quality
title_fullStr Using online peer feedback tools to improve undergraduate group interaction and assessment quality
title_full_unstemmed Using online peer feedback tools to improve undergraduate group interaction and assessment quality
title_sort Using online peer feedback tools to improve undergraduate group interaction and assessment quality
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Emery, Kirsty
Shephard, Mark
Matthews, Susan
author Emery, Kirsty
author_facet Emery, Kirsty
Shephard, Mark
Matthews, Susan
author_role author
author2 Shephard, Mark
Matthews, Susan
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositorio Institucional de la Universitat Politècnica de València Riunet
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Feedback
Peer
Feedback Fruits
Assessment
Quality
topic Feedback
Peer
Feedback Fruits
Assessment
Quality
description [EN] In higher education, sophisticated online learning management systems offer educators unprecedented opportunity to design and implement assessment-specific feedback rubrics with relative ease. In 2022, Feedback Fruits, a flexible, online feedback tool, became available at Flinders University (Australia) with system migration to Canvas. This study evaluated the acceptability and impact of online peer feedback rubrics introduced to a group assessment in a 3rd year, undergraduate, medical science topic. In this study, online feedback participation rates were high (range 84.3-96%), with participants preference for anonymous feedback (77%). Mean peer evaluation scores improved for information sharing, task completion and discussion at final assessment; with feedback received ranked ‘high’ by 56.8% of students. Mean group evaluation scores improved for topic coverage, poster format and referencing at final assessment; with feedback received ranked ‘high’ by 59.1% of. students. In summary, online peer feedback improved student engagement and group assessment learning in this topic.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024
2024-06-24
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv book part
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_3248
VoR
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85
dc.type.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/bookPart
format bookPart
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv https://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/206685
url https://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/206685
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
eng
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Reconocimiento - No comercial - Compartir igual (by-nc-sa)
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
dc.rights.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
Reconocimiento - No comercial - Compartir igual (by-nc-sa)
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editorial Universitat Politècnica de València
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Editorial Universitat Politècnica de València
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:RiuNet. Repositorio Institucional de la Universitat Politécnica de Valéncia
instname:Universitat Politècnica de València (UPV)
instname_str Universitat Politècnica de València (UPV)
reponame_str RiuNet. Repositorio Institucional de la Universitat Politécnica de Valéncia
collection RiuNet. Repositorio Institucional de la Universitat Politécnica de Valéncia
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869410216078999552
score 15,811543

Similares en LA Referencia