Descriptive analysis of the different phenotypes of cardiac remodeling in fetal growth restriction

Objective: To identify the presence of different cardiac phenotypes among FGR. Study Design: Fetal echocardiography was performed in 126 FGR (defined as birth weight <10th centile) and 64 adequate for gestational age (AGA). Principal component and cluster analyses were performed to identify d...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Authors: Rodríguez-López, Mérida, Cruz-Lemini, Mónica, Valenzuela Alcaraz, Brenda, Garcia‐Otero, Laura, Sitges, Marta, Bijnens, Bart, Gratacós Solsona, Eduard, Crispi Brillas, Fàtima
Format: article
Status:Versión aceptada para publicación
Publication Date:2017
Country:España
Institution:Universitat Pompeu Fabra
Repository:Repositorio Digital de la UPF
OAI Identifier:oai:repositori.upf.edu:10230/36999
Online Access:http://hdl.handle.net/10230/36999
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/uog.17365
Access Level:Open access
Keyword:Echocardiography
Fetal growth restriction
Phenotype
Ventricular cardiac remodeling
Description
Summary:Objective: To identify the presence of different cardiac phenotypes among FGR. Study Design: Fetal echocardiography was performed in 126 FGR (defined as birth weight <10th centile) and 64 adequate for gestational age (AGA). Principal component and cluster analyses were performed to identify different cardiac phenotypes among FGR cases. Results: Three different cardiac phenotypes were identified within FGR: globular, elongated and hypertrophic. Most FGR cases (54%) were characterized by a ‘globular’ heart with the lowest left ventricular sphericity index (controls: median 1.78 (interquartile range 1.62-1.97), FGR-elongated: 1.92 (1.78-2.09), FGR-globular 1.44 (1.36-1.52) and FGR-hypertrophic 1.65 (1.42-1.77), P=0.001), while 29% of the cases showed an ‘elongated’ left ventricle with nearly normal cardiac dimensions. Finally, 17% of the FGR showed a ‘hypertrophic’ phenotype with the highest values in left ventricular wall thickness (controls: 1.22 mm/kg (1.1-1.67), FGR-elongated: 1.52 (1.28-1.86), FGR-globular 1.65 (1.39-1.99) and FGR-hypertrophic 3.68 (3.45-4.71), P=0.001) and cardiac dimensions. The globular and elongated phenotype showed fetoplacental profile of late-onset FGR while the hypertrophic phenotype showed signs of early-onset FGR The hypertrophic cluster also showed the worst perinatal results presenting the lowest birthweight centile, gestational age at birth, Apgar score, and the highest postnatal blood pressure and carotid intima media thickness. Conclusions: FGR induces at least 3 different cardiac phenotypes, with early-onset FGR cases associated with a hypertrophic response and worse perinatal outcomes. This cardiac phenotypic classification may improve identification of those FGR cases with the highest perinatal and long-term cardiovascular risk.