Influence of Production Strategy on Gross Waste Output and Temporal Pattern of Gilthead Seabream (Sparus Aurata) Farming: Implications for Environmental Management

This study compares the farm management model used in the Mediterranean gilthead seabream (GHSB; Sparus aurata) industry (S1)—stepped entry of juveniles throughout the year with several production cycles and fish ages overlapping in a single farm—with that used in the salmon industry (S2)—the whole...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Aguado-Giménez, Felipe, Ballester-Moltó, Mateo, García-García, Benjamín
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Estado:Versión publicada
Fecha de publicación:2022
País:España
Institución:Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
Repositorio:DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
OAI Identifier:oai:digital.csic.es:10261/313960
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/10261/313960
https://doi.org/10.3390/w14050788
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Centro Oceanográfico de Santander
fallowing
Acuicultura
Modelling
production strategy
recovery
Sparus aurata
waste output
oceanography
water
research
Aquaculture
id ES_69bc80bbd4c2d8e106367e6f3557b6ae
oai_identifier_str oai:digital.csic.es:10261/313960
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling Influence of Production Strategy on Gross Waste Output and Temporal Pattern of Gilthead Seabream (Sparus Aurata) Farming: Implications for Environmental ManagementAguado-Giménez, FelipeBallester-Moltó, MateoGarcía-García, BenjamínCentro Oceanográfico de SantanderfallowingAcuiculturaModellingproduction strategyrecoverySparus auratawaste outputoceanographywaterresearchAquacultureThis study compares the farm management model used in the Mediterranean gilthead seabream (GHSB; Sparus aurata) industry (S1)—stepped entry of juveniles throughout the year with several production cycles and fish ages overlapping in a single farm—with that used in the salmon industry (S2)—the whole is farm filled with fish that are the same age at once with a fallowing period between rearing cycles—in terms of waste production by coupling digestibility coefficients with growth, feeding, and eating behavior models into a mass balance model. We considered the total C, N, and P content in the different waste fractions (particulate and dissolved wastes). The model, which simulated real farming conditions, showed relevant quantitative and qualitative differences between both strategies, with stocked biomass and water temperature as the main drivers, the amount of feed wasted by chewing as the most relevant fraction differentiating both strategies, and the fallowing period as the main distinguishing management feature. We discuss the influence of both farming strategies on some key performance and environmental aspects, such as benthic recovery, the breakdown of the life cycle of pathogens, and adaptability to climate change. Our results suggest that changing the GHSB industry’s production model is necessary for its sustainability.SI202320232022info:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Publisher's versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/313960https://doi.org/10.3390/w14050788reponame:DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSICinstname:Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)InglésCentro Oceanográfico de Santanderhttps://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/14/5/788info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:digital.csic.es:10261/3139602026-05-22T06:33:51Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Influence of Production Strategy on Gross Waste Output and Temporal Pattern of Gilthead Seabream (Sparus Aurata) Farming: Implications for Environmental Management
title Influence of Production Strategy on Gross Waste Output and Temporal Pattern of Gilthead Seabream (Sparus Aurata) Farming: Implications for Environmental Management
spellingShingle Influence of Production Strategy on Gross Waste Output and Temporal Pattern of Gilthead Seabream (Sparus Aurata) Farming: Implications for Environmental Management
Aguado-Giménez, Felipe
Centro Oceanográfico de Santander
fallowing
Acuicultura
Modelling
production strategy
recovery
Sparus aurata
waste output
oceanography
water
research
Aquaculture
title_short Influence of Production Strategy on Gross Waste Output and Temporal Pattern of Gilthead Seabream (Sparus Aurata) Farming: Implications for Environmental Management
title_full Influence of Production Strategy on Gross Waste Output and Temporal Pattern of Gilthead Seabream (Sparus Aurata) Farming: Implications for Environmental Management
title_fullStr Influence of Production Strategy on Gross Waste Output and Temporal Pattern of Gilthead Seabream (Sparus Aurata) Farming: Implications for Environmental Management
title_full_unstemmed Influence of Production Strategy on Gross Waste Output and Temporal Pattern of Gilthead Seabream (Sparus Aurata) Farming: Implications for Environmental Management
title_sort Influence of Production Strategy on Gross Waste Output and Temporal Pattern of Gilthead Seabream (Sparus Aurata) Farming: Implications for Environmental Management
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Aguado-Giménez, Felipe
Ballester-Moltó, Mateo
García-García, Benjamín
author Aguado-Giménez, Felipe
author_facet Aguado-Giménez, Felipe
Ballester-Moltó, Mateo
García-García, Benjamín
author_role author
author2 Ballester-Moltó, Mateo
García-García, Benjamín
author2_role author
author
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Centro Oceanográfico de Santander
fallowing
Acuicultura
Modelling
production strategy
recovery
Sparus aurata
waste output
oceanography
water
research
Aquaculture
topic Centro Oceanográfico de Santander
fallowing
Acuicultura
Modelling
production strategy
recovery
Sparus aurata
waste output
oceanography
water
research
Aquaculture
description This study compares the farm management model used in the Mediterranean gilthead seabream (GHSB; Sparus aurata) industry (S1)—stepped entry of juveniles throughout the year with several production cycles and fish ages overlapping in a single farm—with that used in the salmon industry (S2)—the whole is farm filled with fish that are the same age at once with a fallowing period between rearing cycles—in terms of waste production by coupling digestibility coefficients with growth, feeding, and eating behavior models into a mass balance model. We considered the total C, N, and P content in the different waste fractions (particulate and dissolved wastes). The model, which simulated real farming conditions, showed relevant quantitative and qualitative differences between both strategies, with stocked biomass and water temperature as the main drivers, the amount of feed wasted by chewing as the most relevant fraction differentiating both strategies, and the fallowing period as the main distinguishing management feature. We discuss the influence of both farming strategies on some key performance and environmental aspects, such as benthic recovery, the breakdown of the life cycle of pathogens, and adaptability to climate change. Our results suggest that changing the GHSB industry’s production model is necessary for its sustainability.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022
2023
2023
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501
Publisher's version
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10261/313960
https://doi.org/10.3390/w14050788
url http://hdl.handle.net/10261/313960
https://doi.org/10.3390/w14050788
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Centro Oceanográfico de Santander
https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/14/5/788
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
instname:Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
instname_str Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
reponame_str DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
collection DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869410051242852352
score 15,811543