Predicting Impulse Control Disorders in Parkinson Disease through Incentive Biomarkers

Objective: This study was undertaken to evaluate whether the feedback-related negativity (FRN)-a neurophysiological marker of incentive processing-can be used to predict the development of impulse control disorders (ICDs) in Parkinson disease (PD). Methods: The longitudinal cohort consisted of conse...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Marín-Lahoz, Juan|||0000-0003-0008-2360, Martínez-Horta, Saul|||0000-0003-0125-7249, Pagonabarraga Mora, Javier|||0000-0002-3248-704X, Horta-Barba, Andrea|||0000-0003-0050-5466, Aracil-Bolaños, Ignacio|||0000-0002-8246-5025, Bejr-kasem, Helena|||0000-0001-8828-5976, Sampedro, Frederic|||0000-0002-3933-1355, Campolongo, Antonia|||0000-0002-7962-3264, Kulisevsky, Jaime|||0000-0003-4870-1431
Tipo de documento: artigo
Data de publicação:2022
País:España
Recursos:Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
Repositório:Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB
Idioma:inglês
OAI Identifier:oai:ddd.uab.cat:283209
Acesso em linha:https://ddd.uab.cat/record/283209
https://dx.doi.org/urn:doi:10.1002/ana.26486
Access Level:Acceso aberto
Palavra-chave:Biomarkers
Disruptive, Impulse Control, and Conduct Disorders
Dopamine Agonists
Humans
Motivation
Parkinson Disease
Prospective Studies
Descrição
Resumo:Objective: This study was undertaken to evaluate whether the feedback-related negativity (FRN)-a neurophysiological marker of incentive processing-can be used to predict the development of impulse control disorders (ICDs) in Parkinson disease (PD). Methods: The longitudinal cohort consisted of consecutive nondemented PD patients with no ICD history. We recorded FRN signals while they performed a gambling task. We calculated the mean amplitude difference between losses and gains (FRNdiff) to be used as a predictor of future ICD development. We performed prospective biannual follow-up assessments for 30 months to detect incident ICDs. Finally, we evaluated how basal FRNdiff was associated with posterior development of ICDs using survival models. Results: Between October 7, 2015 and December 16, 2016, we screened 120 patients. Among them, 94 patients performed the gambling and 92 completed the follow-up. Eighteen patients developed ICDs during follow-up, whereas 74 remained free of ICDs. Baseline FRNdiff was greater in patients who developed ICDs than in those who did not (-2.33μV vs -0.84μV, p = 0.001). No other significant baseline differences were found. The FRNdiff was significantly associated with ICD development in the survival models both when not adjusted (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.58-0.91, p = 0.006) and when controlling for dopamine replacement therapy, sex, and age (HR = 0.74, 95% CI = 0.55-0.97, p = 0.035). None of the impulsivity measures evaluated was related to ICD development. Interpretation: Reward-processing differences measured by FRN signals precede ICD development in PD. This neurophysiological marker permits identification of patients with high risk of ICD development. ANN NEUROL 2022;92:974-984.