EASIER System. Evaluating a spanish lexical simplification proposal with people with cognitive impairments

Cognitive impairments in text reading and understanding not only affect individuals with intellectual disabilities but also deaf and deaf-blind ones, the illiterate, and immigrants whose native language is different, among others. Technology to support accessibility to texts is required to help peop...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Alarcon, Rodrigo, Moreno, Lourdes, Martínez, Paloma, Macías Iglesias, José Antonio
Formato: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2022
País:España
Recursos:Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
Repositorio:Biblos-e Archivo. Repositorio Institucional de la UAM
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:repositorio.uam.es:10486/711581
Acesso em linha:http://hdl.handle.net/10486/711581
https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2134074
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palavra-chave:Cognitive accessibility
lexical simplification
spanish
user study
readability
Informática
id ES_670fb5a2579cf1892e27263fa29d8aeb
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.uam.es:10486/711581
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling EASIER System. Evaluating a spanish lexical simplification proposal with people with cognitive impairmentsAlarcon, RodrigoMoreno, LourdesMartínez, PalomaMacías Iglesias, José AntonioCognitive accessibilitylexical simplificationspanishuser studyreadabilityInformáticaCognitive impairments in text reading and understanding not only affect individuals with intellectual disabilities but also deaf and deaf-blind ones, the illiterate, and immigrants whose native language is different, among others. Technology to support accessibility to texts is required to help people to understand information. This article addresses an evaluation of the EASIER tool conducted with intellectual disabilities and older people for the identification of complex and unusual words in Spanish texts and proposes them simpler synonyms for the complex word detected. Fifty participants were recruited in collaboration with an organization that works with people with intellectual disabilities. The participants were divided into two groups: Group 1 represented 25 older people, and Group 2 represented 25 people with intellectual disabilities. The evaluation showed that, for complex word identification, the selected texts were more complex in content for people with intellectual disabilities than for older people, which consequently suggests that the proposal had a greater benefit for the intellectually disabled group. Related to the proposal of substitutes for complex words, there is a high number of substitutions accepted in participants with a high school level of education for Group 1 and primary level of education for Group 2. Additional multivariate analysis shows that the system is adequate for people of advanced ageThis work is part of the R&D&i ACCESS2MEET (PID2020-116527RB-I0) project financed by MCIN AEI/10.13039/501100011033/, and the ”Intelligent and interactive home care system for the mitigation of the COVID-19 pandemic” project (PRTRREACT UE) awarded by CAM. CONSEJER´IA DE EDUCACI ´ON E INVESTIGACIONTaylor & FrancisDepartamento de Ingeniería InformáticaEscuela Politécnica Superior20222022-10-24research articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1AMhttp://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aainfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10486/711581https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2134074reponame:Biblos-e Archivo. Repositorio Institucional de la UAMinstname:Universidad Autónoma de MadridInglésengopen accesshttp://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:repositorio.uam.es:10486/7115812026-06-23T12:46:27Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv EASIER System. Evaluating a spanish lexical simplification proposal with people with cognitive impairments
title EASIER System. Evaluating a spanish lexical simplification proposal with people with cognitive impairments
spellingShingle EASIER System. Evaluating a spanish lexical simplification proposal with people with cognitive impairments
Alarcon, Rodrigo
Cognitive accessibility
lexical simplification
spanish
user study
readability
Informática
title_short EASIER System. Evaluating a spanish lexical simplification proposal with people with cognitive impairments
title_full EASIER System. Evaluating a spanish lexical simplification proposal with people with cognitive impairments
title_fullStr EASIER System. Evaluating a spanish lexical simplification proposal with people with cognitive impairments
title_full_unstemmed EASIER System. Evaluating a spanish lexical simplification proposal with people with cognitive impairments
title_sort EASIER System. Evaluating a spanish lexical simplification proposal with people with cognitive impairments
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv Alarcon, Rodrigo
Moreno, Lourdes
Martínez, Paloma
Macías Iglesias, José Antonio
author Alarcon, Rodrigo
author_facet Alarcon, Rodrigo
Moreno, Lourdes
Martínez, Paloma
Macías Iglesias, José Antonio
author_role author
author2 Moreno, Lourdes
Martínez, Paloma
Macías Iglesias, José Antonio
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Departamento de Ingeniería Informática
Escuela Politécnica Superior
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Cognitive accessibility
lexical simplification
spanish
user study
readability
Informática
topic Cognitive accessibility
lexical simplification
spanish
user study
readability
Informática
description Cognitive impairments in text reading and understanding not only affect individuals with intellectual disabilities but also deaf and deaf-blind ones, the illiterate, and immigrants whose native language is different, among others. Technology to support accessibility to texts is required to help people to understand information. This article addresses an evaluation of the EASIER tool conducted with intellectual disabilities and older people for the identification of complex and unusual words in Spanish texts and proposes them simpler synonyms for the complex word detected. Fifty participants were recruited in collaboration with an organization that works with people with intellectual disabilities. The participants were divided into two groups: Group 1 represented 25 older people, and Group 2 represented 25 people with intellectual disabilities. The evaluation showed that, for complex word identification, the selected texts were more complex in content for people with intellectual disabilities than for older people, which consequently suggests that the proposal had a greater benefit for the intellectually disabled group. Related to the proposal of substitutes for complex words, there is a high number of substitutions accepted in participants with a high school level of education for Group 1 and primary level of education for Group 2. Additional multivariate analysis shows that the system is adequate for people of advanced age
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022
2022-10-24
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv research article
http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_2df8fbb1
AM
http://purl.org/coar/version/c_ab4af688f83e57aa
dc.type.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10486/711581
https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2134074
url http://hdl.handle.net/10486/711581
https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2134074
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
eng
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
language eng
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
dc.rights.openaire.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv open access
http://purl.org/coar/access_right/c_abf2
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Taylor & Francis
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Taylor & Francis
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Biblos-e Archivo. Repositorio Institucional de la UAM
instname:Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
instname_str Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
reponame_str Biblos-e Archivo. Repositorio Institucional de la UAM
collection Biblos-e Archivo. Repositorio Institucional de la UAM
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869409862480297984
score 15.300724