A comparison of office workers’ co-creation experiences: A Health CASCADE multiple case study

Objectives Co-creation can used to develop public health interventions, improve their effectiveness, and increase intervention uptake through engaging stakeholders, but there is little in-depth exploration of the co-creators’ experience of taking part. Understanding the experience of taking part in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: McCaffrey, Lauren, de Boer, Janneke, Vogelsang, Mira, Giné-Garriga, Maria, McCann, Bryan, Dall, Philippa
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2025
País:España
Institución:Universitat Ramon Llull (URL)
Repositorio:DAU Arxiu Digital de la Universitat Ramon Llull
OAI Identifier:oai:dau.url.edu:20.500.14342/5047
Acceso en línea:http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14342/5047
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2025.01.034
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Co-creació
Salut pública
Evaluació
Lloc de treball
id ES_66aed61be8ba3e8cbcc948824d09da8d
oai_identifier_str oai:dau.url.edu:20.500.14342/5047
network_acronym_str ES
network_name_str España
repository_id_str
spelling A comparison of office workers’ co-creation experiences: A Health CASCADE multiple case studyMcCaffrey, Laurende Boer, JannekeVogelsang, MiraGiné-Garriga, MariaMcCann, BryanDall, PhilippaCo-creacióSalut públicaEvaluacióLloc de treballObjectives Co-creation can used to develop public health interventions, improve their effectiveness, and increase intervention uptake through engaging stakeholders, but there is little in-depth exploration of the co-creators’ experience of taking part. Understanding the experience of taking part in a co-creation process can enhance future participation experiences, promote engagement and help design better co-creation processes in the future. The objective of this study was to explore the experiences of co-creators (i.e., office workers) involved in the co-creation process to address workplace sedentary behaviour. Study design Multiple case study. Methods Three small-to-medium sized enterprises participated in separate co-creation processes. Data were generated from observations during the workshops and semi-structured interviews (n = 31) employing elicitation techniques conducted after the co-creation process was completed. Each of the three cases were analysed separately (using thematic analysis), which then informed the cross-case comparison, the focus of this study. Results Comparison of co-creators' experiences across the three cases identified psychological, emotional, social and cognitive experiences which occurred before, during and after the co-creation process. The analysis identified both intended (e.g., sedentary behaviour awareness) and unintended (e.g., forming relationships) outcomes from these experiences. These experiences and outcomes were influenced by factors such as workplace environment and structure, design of the co-creation process and how it was facilitated, highlighting the interplay between the co-creation context and the broader work context. Conclusion This study contributes to the understanding of co-creation experience in the workplace setting. Recommendations were derived from using an iterative reflection process of the three cases.info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionElsevier. The Royal Society for Public HealthUniversitat Ramon Llull. Facultat de Psicologia, Ciències de l'Educació i de l'Esport Blanquerna202520252025info:eu-repo/semantics/article8application/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14342/5047https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2025.01.034reponame:DAU Arxiu Digital de la Universitat Ramon Llullinstname:Universitat Ramon Llull (URL)InglésPublic Health, Volum 241, abril 2025, pp. 75-82info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EU/H2020/Grant agreement No. 956501© L'autor/aAttribution 4.0 Internationalhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:dau.url.edu:20.500.14342/50472026-06-21T06:40:37Z
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A comparison of office workers’ co-creation experiences: A Health CASCADE multiple case study
title A comparison of office workers’ co-creation experiences: A Health CASCADE multiple case study
spellingShingle A comparison of office workers’ co-creation experiences: A Health CASCADE multiple case study
McCaffrey, Lauren
Co-creació
Salut pública
Evaluació
Lloc de treball
title_short A comparison of office workers’ co-creation experiences: A Health CASCADE multiple case study
title_full A comparison of office workers’ co-creation experiences: A Health CASCADE multiple case study
title_fullStr A comparison of office workers’ co-creation experiences: A Health CASCADE multiple case study
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of office workers’ co-creation experiences: A Health CASCADE multiple case study
title_sort A comparison of office workers’ co-creation experiences: A Health CASCADE multiple case study
dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv McCaffrey, Lauren
de Boer, Janneke
Vogelsang, Mira
Giné-Garriga, Maria
McCann, Bryan
Dall, Philippa
author McCaffrey, Lauren
author_facet McCaffrey, Lauren
de Boer, Janneke
Vogelsang, Mira
Giné-Garriga, Maria
McCann, Bryan
Dall, Philippa
author_role author
author2 de Boer, Janneke
Vogelsang, Mira
Giné-Garriga, Maria
McCann, Bryan
Dall, Philippa
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universitat Ramon Llull. Facultat de Psicologia, Ciències de l'Educació i de l'Esport Blanquerna
dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv Co-creació
Salut pública
Evaluació
Lloc de treball
topic Co-creació
Salut pública
Evaluació
Lloc de treball
description Objectives Co-creation can used to develop public health interventions, improve their effectiveness, and increase intervention uptake through engaging stakeholders, but there is little in-depth exploration of the co-creators’ experience of taking part. Understanding the experience of taking part in a co-creation process can enhance future participation experiences, promote engagement and help design better co-creation processes in the future. The objective of this study was to explore the experiences of co-creators (i.e., office workers) involved in the co-creation process to address workplace sedentary behaviour. Study design Multiple case study. Methods Three small-to-medium sized enterprises participated in separate co-creation processes. Data were generated from observations during the workshops and semi-structured interviews (n = 31) employing elicitation techniques conducted after the co-creation process was completed. Each of the three cases were analysed separately (using thematic analysis), which then informed the cross-case comparison, the focus of this study. Results Comparison of co-creators' experiences across the three cases identified psychological, emotional, social and cognitive experiences which occurred before, during and after the co-creation process. The analysis identified both intended (e.g., sedentary behaviour awareness) and unintended (e.g., forming relationships) outcomes from these experiences. These experiences and outcomes were influenced by factors such as workplace environment and structure, design of the co-creation process and how it was facilitated, highlighting the interplay between the co-creation context and the broader work context. Conclusion This study contributes to the understanding of co-creation experience in the workplace setting. Recommendations were derived from using an iterative reflection process of the three cases.
publishDate 2025
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2025
2025
2025
dc.type.none.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14342/5047
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2025.01.034
url http://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14342/5047
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2025.01.034
dc.language.none.fl_str_mv Inglés
language_invalid_str_mv Inglés
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Public Health, Volum 241, abril 2025, pp. 75-82
info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EU/H2020/Grant agreement No. 956501
dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv © L'autor/a
Attribution 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv © L'autor/a
Attribution 4.0 International
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv 8
application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier. The Royal Society for Public Health
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Elsevier. The Royal Society for Public Health
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:DAU Arxiu Digital de la Universitat Ramon Llull
instname:Universitat Ramon Llull (URL)
instname_str Universitat Ramon Llull (URL)
reponame_str DAU Arxiu Digital de la Universitat Ramon Llull
collection DAU Arxiu Digital de la Universitat Ramon Llull
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1869409834699325440
score 15,811543

Similares en LA Referencia