Does exposure and response prevention improve the results of group cognitive-behavioural therapy for male slot machine pathological gamblers?

Introduction. Cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) seems to offer effective treat- ment for pathological gambling (PG). However, it has not yet been established which techniques yield the best results, or whether exposure and response prevention (ERP) techniques are of additional use. Objectives. To...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Jiménez Murcia, Susana|||0000-0002-3596-8033, Aymamí, Neus|||0000-0002-4607-9565, Gomez-Peña, Monica|||0000-0001-6194-8266, Santamaría, Juan José|||0000-0001-9957-9363, Alvarez Moya, Eva Maria|||0000-0002-3723-3225, Fernández Aranda, Fernando|||0000-0002-2968-9898, Granero, Roser|||0000-0001-6308-3198, Penelo Werner, Eva|||0000-0001-6796-7660, Bueno, Blanca, Moragas, Laura|||0000-0001-5235-7026, Gunnard, Katarina|||0000-0002-8002-0997, Menchón Magriñá, José Manuel|||0000-0002-6231-6524
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2012
País:España
Institución:Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
Repositorio:Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:ddd.uab.cat:319681
Acceso en línea:https://ddd.uab.cat/record/319681
https://dx.doi.org/urn:doi:10.1111/j.2044-8260.2011.02012.x
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Cognitive-behavioural therapy
Pathological gambling
Exposure and response prevention
Descripción
Sumario:Introduction. Cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) seems to offer effective treat- ment for pathological gambling (PG). However, it has not yet been established which techniques yield the best results, or whether exposure and response prevention (ERP) techniques are of additional use. Objectives. To evaluate clinical and socio-demographic characteristics of a PG sample at baseline, comparing cognitive-behavioural group intervention, with and without exposure, with response prevention (CBT + ERP vs. CBT), to compare the results of therapy and to assess pre-post changes in psychopathology between both groups. Design. We applied a quasi-experimental design comprising intervention on the independent variable, but without random assignment. Methods. The sample comprised 502 males with PG, consecutively admitted to a specialist unit, who received standardized outpatient CBT group therapy in 16 weekly sessions. Scores on the Symptom Checklist-Revised (SCL-90-R), the Temperament and Character Inventory-Revised (TCI-R), the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS), and other clinical and psychopathological scales were recorded. Results. Pre-post changes did not differ between groups, except for SCL paranoid ideation, being greater in the CBT therapy group. The risk of relapse during treatment was similar in the CBT + ERP and CBT patients. However, compliance with treatment was poorer in the CBT + ERP group, who presented higher drop-out rates during treatment. Drop-out during therapy was associated with shorter disorder duration and higher scores on the TCI-R novelty seeking scale. Conclusions. Although the two CBT programs elicited similar therapy responses, patients receiving CBT alone showed higher adherence to therapy and lower drop-out rates.