Evaluation of Three Sample Preparation Methods for LC-HRMS Suspect Screening of Contaminants of Emerging Concern in Effluent Wastewater
Suspect screening is a valuable tool for studying the pollution footprint of environmental samples, but the sample preparation (SP) method significantly affects the results. In this study, three SP methods─lyophilization, direct injection, and online solid-phase extraction (SPE)─were evaluated for s...
| Autores: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | artículo |
| Estado: | Versión publicada |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2025 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC) |
| Repositorio: | DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:digital.csic.es:10261/410615 |
| Acceso en línea: | http://hdl.handle.net/10261/410615 https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/105023835527 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Pollution footprint Suspect screening http://metadata.un.org/sdg/13 http://metadata.un.org/sdg/12 http://metadata.un.org/sdg/6 http://metadata.un.org/sdg/11 http://metadata.un.org/sdg/3 http://metadata.un.org/sdg/9 Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all Build resilient infrastructure, promote inclusive and sustainable industrialization and foster innovation Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns Take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts |
| id |
ES_65fd2cc3f841ac23116a34239e8fbfe3 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:digital.csic.es:10261/410615 |
| network_acronym_str |
ES |
| network_name_str |
España |
| repository_id_str |
|
| spelling |
Evaluation of Three Sample Preparation Methods for LC-HRMS Suspect Screening of Contaminants of Emerging Concern in Effluent WastewaterOrlando-Véliz, DanaBonansea, Rocío InésGarcía-Vara, ManuelNikolopoulou, VarvaraLópez de Alda, MirenPollution footprintSuspect screeninghttp://metadata.un.org/sdg/13http://metadata.un.org/sdg/12http://metadata.un.org/sdg/6http://metadata.un.org/sdg/11http://metadata.un.org/sdg/3http://metadata.un.org/sdg/9Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all agesEnsure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for allBuild resilient infrastructure, promote inclusive and sustainable industrialization and foster innovationMake cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainableEnsure sustainable consumption and production patternsTake urgent action to combat climate change and its impactsSuspect screening is a valuable tool for studying the pollution footprint of environmental samples, but the sample preparation (SP) method significantly affects the results. In this study, three SP methods─lyophilization, direct injection, and online solid-phase extraction (SPE)─were evaluated for suspect screening of contaminants of emerging concern (CECs) in effluent wastewater using liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS). LC-HRMS was performed with a Q-ToF mass analyzer in both positive and negative electrospray ionization modes, and pollutants were identified using the NORMAN SusDat database. A total of 119 CECs were identified with high confidence (all above level 2a). Of these, 115 were detected using lyophilization, 37 with direct injection, and 49 with online SPE. Principal component analysis revealed distinct patterns for each SP method. In all cases, the pollution profile was dominated by pharmaceuticals, followed by industrial chemicals. Articaine, a local anesthetic previously unreported in the aquatic environment, was the most abundant compound found. Industrial chemicals included phthalates, flame retardants, benzotriazoles, and perfluoroalkyl substances, among others. The remaining identified CECs were personal care products, pesticides, and drugs of abuse. Compound prioritization, based on abundance, persistence, mobility, bioaccumulation potential, and toxicity, identified the antibiotics clindamycin and tiamulin, the analgesic flufenamic acid, the musk fragrance metabolite galaxolidone, and the antidepressant venlafaxine metabolite, O-desmethyl venlafaxine, as top priority. These results highlight the importance of applying an appropriate SP method to obtain a comprehensive CEC footprint in suspect screening analysis and demonstrate the suitability of lyophilization for wastewater characterization.This work was supported by the European Commission (Project PROMISCES, number 101036449) and by the Government of Catalonia (2021 SGR 00753). RIB acknowledges her fellowship from the Technical Support Personnel Subprogram (PTA2019-017397-I/AEI/10.13039/501100011033). The authors thank Begoña Martínez and Josep Pascual from the Consorci Besòs Tordera for the provision of the water samples. Biotage is acknowledged for the gift of on-line SPE columns.Peer reviewedAmerican Chemical Society0000-0001-7980-21420000-0002-9347-2765Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas [https://ror.org/02gfc7t72]202520252025info:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501Publisher's versioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttp://hdl.handle.net/10261/410615https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/105023835527reponame:DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSICinstname:Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)Inglés#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE#info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/101036449Analytical chemistryhttps://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.5c01659Síinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessoai:digital.csic.es:10261/4106152026-05-22T06:33:51Z |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Evaluation of Three Sample Preparation Methods for LC-HRMS Suspect Screening of Contaminants of Emerging Concern in Effluent Wastewater |
| title |
Evaluation of Three Sample Preparation Methods for LC-HRMS Suspect Screening of Contaminants of Emerging Concern in Effluent Wastewater |
| spellingShingle |
Evaluation of Three Sample Preparation Methods for LC-HRMS Suspect Screening of Contaminants of Emerging Concern in Effluent Wastewater Orlando-Véliz, Dana Pollution footprint Suspect screening http://metadata.un.org/sdg/13 http://metadata.un.org/sdg/12 http://metadata.un.org/sdg/6 http://metadata.un.org/sdg/11 http://metadata.un.org/sdg/3 http://metadata.un.org/sdg/9 Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all Build resilient infrastructure, promote inclusive and sustainable industrialization and foster innovation Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns Take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts |
| title_short |
Evaluation of Three Sample Preparation Methods for LC-HRMS Suspect Screening of Contaminants of Emerging Concern in Effluent Wastewater |
| title_full |
Evaluation of Three Sample Preparation Methods for LC-HRMS Suspect Screening of Contaminants of Emerging Concern in Effluent Wastewater |
| title_fullStr |
Evaluation of Three Sample Preparation Methods for LC-HRMS Suspect Screening of Contaminants of Emerging Concern in Effluent Wastewater |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Evaluation of Three Sample Preparation Methods for LC-HRMS Suspect Screening of Contaminants of Emerging Concern in Effluent Wastewater |
| title_sort |
Evaluation of Three Sample Preparation Methods for LC-HRMS Suspect Screening of Contaminants of Emerging Concern in Effluent Wastewater |
| dc.creator.none.fl_str_mv |
Orlando-Véliz, Dana Bonansea, Rocío Inés García-Vara, Manuel Nikolopoulou, Varvara López de Alda, Miren |
| author |
Orlando-Véliz, Dana |
| author_facet |
Orlando-Véliz, Dana Bonansea, Rocío Inés García-Vara, Manuel Nikolopoulou, Varvara López de Alda, Miren |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Bonansea, Rocío Inés García-Vara, Manuel Nikolopoulou, Varvara López de Alda, Miren |
| author2_role |
author author author author |
| dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
0000-0001-7980-2142 0000-0002-9347-2765 Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas [https://ror.org/02gfc7t72] |
| dc.subject.none.fl_str_mv |
Pollution footprint Suspect screening http://metadata.un.org/sdg/13 http://metadata.un.org/sdg/12 http://metadata.un.org/sdg/6 http://metadata.un.org/sdg/11 http://metadata.un.org/sdg/3 http://metadata.un.org/sdg/9 Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all Build resilient infrastructure, promote inclusive and sustainable industrialization and foster innovation Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns Take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts |
| topic |
Pollution footprint Suspect screening http://metadata.un.org/sdg/13 http://metadata.un.org/sdg/12 http://metadata.un.org/sdg/6 http://metadata.un.org/sdg/11 http://metadata.un.org/sdg/3 http://metadata.un.org/sdg/9 Ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all Build resilient infrastructure, promote inclusive and sustainable industrialization and foster innovation Make cities and human settlements inclusive, safe, resilient and sustainable Ensure sustainable consumption and production patterns Take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts |
| description |
Suspect screening is a valuable tool for studying the pollution footprint of environmental samples, but the sample preparation (SP) method significantly affects the results. In this study, three SP methods─lyophilization, direct injection, and online solid-phase extraction (SPE)─were evaluated for suspect screening of contaminants of emerging concern (CECs) in effluent wastewater using liquid chromatography-high resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS). LC-HRMS was performed with a Q-ToF mass analyzer in both positive and negative electrospray ionization modes, and pollutants were identified using the NORMAN SusDat database. A total of 119 CECs were identified with high confidence (all above level 2a). Of these, 115 were detected using lyophilization, 37 with direct injection, and 49 with online SPE. Principal component analysis revealed distinct patterns for each SP method. In all cases, the pollution profile was dominated by pharmaceuticals, followed by industrial chemicals. Articaine, a local anesthetic previously unreported in the aquatic environment, was the most abundant compound found. Industrial chemicals included phthalates, flame retardants, benzotriazoles, and perfluoroalkyl substances, among others. The remaining identified CECs were personal care products, pesticides, and drugs of abuse. Compound prioritization, based on abundance, persistence, mobility, bioaccumulation potential, and toxicity, identified the antibiotics clindamycin and tiamulin, the analgesic flufenamic acid, the musk fragrance metabolite galaxolidone, and the antidepressant venlafaxine metabolite, O-desmethyl venlafaxine, as top priority. These results highlight the importance of applying an appropriate SP method to obtain a comprehensive CEC footprint in suspect screening analysis and demonstrate the suitability of lyophilization for wastewater characterization. |
| publishDate |
2025 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2025 2025 2025 |
| dc.type.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 Publisher's version info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.none.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10261/410615 https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/105023835527 |
| url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10261/410615 https://api.elsevier.com/content/abstract/scopus_id/105023835527 |
| dc.language.none.fl_str_mv |
Inglés |
| language_invalid_str_mv |
Inglés |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
#PLACEHOLDER_PARENT_METADATA_VALUE# info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/EC/H2020/101036449 Analytical chemistry https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.5c01659 Sí |
| dc.rights.none.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
American Chemical Society |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
American Chemical Society |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC instname:Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC) |
| instname_str |
Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC) |
| reponame_str |
DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC |
| collection |
DIGITAL.CSIC. Repositorio Institucional del CSIC |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
| _version_ |
1869409783090511872 |
| score |
15.81155 |