Gestionar desde la territorialidad: ¿cómo integrar la multifuncionalidad y la participación social en la legitimación del regadío?
[EN] The strategy to manage the territory, natural resources, and social demands has been supported by the development of irrigation along the years. In countries like Spain, France or Italy, the commitment on irrigation attests the inseparable link between all economic and productive water use and...
| Autores: | , , |
|---|---|
| Tipo de recurso: | capítulo de libro |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2015 |
| País: | España |
| Institución: | Universitat Politècnica de València (UPV) |
| Repositorio: | RiuNet. Repositorio Institucional de la Universitat Politécnica de Valéncia |
| Idioma: | español |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:riunet.upv.es:10251/88155 |
| Acceso en línea: | https://riunet.upv.es/handle/10251/88155 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palabra clave: | Irrigation Society Landscape Regadío Sociedad Territorio Paisaje Patrimonio hidráulico Water heritage |
| Sumario: | [EN] The strategy to manage the territory, natural resources, and social demands has been supported by the development of irrigation along the years. In countries like Spain, France or Italy, the commitment on irrigation attests the inseparable link between all economic and productive water use and the structuring of the territory. Regions such as Catalonia, Midi-Pyrenees and Lombardy symbolize, in turn, the broad cultural background of irrigation. In this paper we present three case studies (SegarraGarrigues irrigation canal, Neste irrigation canal, and Muzza irrigation canal) which face multifunctionality differing from irrigation policies, actions, and social perceptions. In turn, the bases of the territorial management of irrigation will be presented as a mechanism to adapt to the complexity to affront the trinomial relationship between availability of natural resources, changing social demands, and the structuring of the territory. The application of those bases is intended to identify variables to justify the (dis) agreement between the diversity of discourses associated with irrigation’ promotion, as well as to determine the dominant stakeholder’ profile, its degree of legitimacy, or ascertain the best strategies and/or actions for the integrated management of water resources between competing water demands. |
|---|