Treatment and Monitoring of Eosinophilic Fasciitis
Purpose of Review Eosinophilic fasciitis (EF) is a rare infammatory disease characterized by skin induration. Although some guidelines from scientifc societies exist, standard recommendations on monitoring and therapy are lacking. Recent Findings Current therapy for patients diagnosed with EF includ...
| Autores: | , , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Formato: | artículo |
| Fecha de publicación: | 2025 |
| País: | España |
| Recursos: | Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona |
| Repositorio: | Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB |
| Idioma: | inglés |
| OAI Identifier: | oai:ddd.uab.cat:310297 |
| Acesso em linha: | https://ddd.uab.cat/record/310297 https://dx.doi.org/urn:doi:10.1007/s40674-024-00222-6 |
| Access Level: | acceso abierto |
| Palavra-chave: | Eosinophilic fasciitis Immunosuppressive treatment Monitoring Unmet needs Groove sign |
| Resumo: | Purpose of Review Eosinophilic fasciitis (EF) is a rare infammatory disease characterized by skin induration. Although some guidelines from scientifc societies exist, standard recommendations on monitoring and therapy are lacking. Recent Findings Current therapy for patients diagnosed with EF includes glucocorticoids plus at least one immunosuppressive drug in cases of relapse or refractory disease. Methotrexate and mycophenolate mofetil are the most recommended, although recently a myriad of case reports or small series reporting the efectivity of biological agents or JAK inhibitors for treating relapses or refractory disease have been published. Anti-IL5 may have a role in those rare refractory cases with persistent eosinophilia. Intravenous immunoglobulins and photopheresis (in those centers with experience) may act as adjuvant therapies. Monitoring the disease activity is a cornerstone to ascertain if the treatment is useful or not. MRI, PET/TC, and more specifcally POCUS have recently demonstrated their value for assessing therapy response. Summary High-quality data focused on therapy and monitoring is lacking in EF. Strategies for improving scientifc quality of observational studies and consensus about "activity", "sequela", "relapse" or "refractoriness" terms in EF patients are necessary to implement prospective clinical trials and generate evidence-based medicine. Meanwhile we have to deal with the available information. |
|---|