Endogenous matching in university-industry collaboration

We use a two-sided matching framework to analyze collaboration between heterogeneous academics and firms. We consider both horizontal and vertical characteristics-those related to affinity (e.g., preferences for a type of scientific research) and those related to ability (e.g., capacity to produce h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: Banal Estañol, Albert, Macho Stadler, Inés|||0000-0002-2415-7972, Pérez Castrillo, David|||0000-0002-1840-7621
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2017
País:España
Institución:Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
Repositorio:Dipòsit Digital de Documents de la UAB
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:ddd.uab.cat:171142
Acceso en línea:https://ddd.uab.cat/record/171142
https://dx.doi.org/urn:doi:10.1287/mnsc.2016.2680
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:Matching
Industry-science links
Research collaborations
Complementarity
Descripción
Sumario:We use a two-sided matching framework to analyze collaboration between heterogeneous academics and firms. We consider both horizontal and vertical characteristics-those related to affinity (e.g., preferences for a type of scientific research) and those related to ability (e.g., capacity to produce high-quality scientific output). We build a unique data set based on the teams of academics and firms that proposed research projects to the UK's Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council. Our results are suggestive of positive assortative matching in terms of ability and type, while the matching is negative assortative in terms of their interactions. The most able and the most applied academics are the ones that are more likely to propose collaborative as opposed to noncollaborative projects.