Cumulative energy demand and global warming potential of a building-integrated solar thermal system with/without phase change material

Building-integrated solar thermal (BIST) systems are a specific type of solar thermal systems which are integrated into the building and they participate in building functionality. The present article is about the life-cycle assessment of different options of a BIST system (Mediterranean climatic co...

ver descrição completa

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autores: Lamnatou, Chrysovalantou, Motte, Fabrice, Notton, Gilles, Chemisana Villegas, Daniel, Cristofari, Christian A.
Formato: artículo
Estado:Versión aceptada para publicación
Fecha de publicación:2018
País:España
Recursos:Varias* (Consorci de Biblioteques Universitáries de Catalunya, Centre de Serveis Científics i Acadèmics de Catalunya)
Repositorio:Recercat. Dipósit de la Recerca de Catalunya
OAI Identifier:oai:recercat.cat:10459.1/62932
Acesso em linha:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.01.027
http://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/62932
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palavra-chave:Life cycle assessment (LCA)
Building-integrated solar thermal (BIST) system
Phase change material (PCM)
Cumulative energy demand (CED
Descrição
Resumo:Building-integrated solar thermal (BIST) systems are a specific type of solar thermal systems which are integrated into the building and they participate in building functionality. The present article is about the life-cycle assessment of different options of a BIST system (Mediterranean climatic conditions: Ajaccio, France). The environmental profile of the studied configurations is assessed by means of CED (cumulative energy demand), GWP (global warming potential) and EPBT (energy payback time). The proposed configurations (for the collector) include: i) a system without PCM (phase change material) using only rock wool as insulation and ii) a system with PCM (myristic acid) and rock wool. Concerning life-cycle results based on CED and GWP 100a (scenario without recycling), the configuration without PCM shows 0.67 MJprim/kWh and 0.06 kg CO2.eq/kWh while the configuration with PCM presents 0.74 MJprim/kWh and 0.08 kg CO2.eq/kWh. Regarding EPBT, if the inputs for pumping/auxiliary heating are not taken into account, both configurations (with/without PCM) have almost the same EPBT (about 1.3 years). On the other hand, if the inputs for pumping/auxiliary heating are considered, EPBT is lower for the system with PCM. In addition, scenarios with recycling have been examined and the results demonstrate that recycling considerably improves the environmental profile of the studied configurations.