Mobility of heavy metals in poorly developed carbonate soils in the Mediterranean region

The sorption and mobility of trace metals in calcareous soils (calcaric Fluvisols) were studied in experimental columns using nine soil samples extracted fromAp andAC horizons, under laboratory conditions.Acontaminating solution with six heavy metals at identical concentrations (350mg kg−1 for eachm...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores: López Lafuente, Antonio Leovigildo, González, Concepción, Quintana Nieto, José Ramón, Vázquez, Antonio, Romero, Arturo
Tipo de recurso: artículo
Fecha de publicación:2008
País:España
Institución:Universidad Complutense de Madrid (UCM)
Repositorio:Docta Complutense
Idioma:inglés
OAI Identifier:oai:docta.ucm.es:20.500.14352/95048
Acceso en línea:https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14352/95048
Access Level:acceso abierto
Palabra clave:631.4
Heavy metals
Experimental columns
Sorption
Mobility
Carbonate soils
Edafología (Farmacia)
2511.04 Química de Suelos
Descripción
Sumario:The sorption and mobility of trace metals in calcareous soils (calcaric Fluvisols) were studied in experimental columns using nine soil samples extracted fromAp andAC horizons, under laboratory conditions.Acontaminating solution with six heavy metals at identical concentrations (350mg kg−1 for eachmetal) was used to saturate the soil columns, and after the contamination assay two successive washes with de-ionized water were performed. Sorption rates were high for all the metals, higher than 90%. However, competition between metals resulted in greater retention of Cr, Cu and Pb than Ni, Zn and Cd. The data on mobility showed that Cr and Pb (values of Kd 5.6×104 and 8.1×104, respectively)were the least mobile metals, Cu and Zn had intermediate values (values of Kd 6.9×103 and 4.8×103, respectively), and Ni and Cd were the most mobile (values of Kd 8.2×102 and 7.2×102, respectively). The mineralogy of the soil constituents was the main factor determining the retention of the metals applied. The differences observed between the soil samples, in both the retention and liberation phases, could not be linked to the properties used to characterize them.